IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/nat/nature/v594y2021i7864d10.1038_s41586-021-03632-x.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Spo11 generates gaps through concerted cuts at sites of topological stress

Author

Listed:
  • Silvia Prieler

    (University of Vienna, Department of Chromosome Biology)

  • Doris Chen

    (University of Vienna, Department of Chromosome Biology)

  • Lingzhi Huang

    (University of Vienna, Department of Chromosome Biology)

  • Elisa Mayrhofer

    (University of Vienna, Department of Chromosome Biology
    Austrian Research Institute for Chemistry and Technology, Microbiology and Cell Culture)

  • Soma Zsótér

    (University of Vienna, Department of Chromosome Biology
    Humboldt University of Berlin, IRI Life Sciences)

  • Magdalena Vesely

    (University of Vienna, Department of Chromosome Biology)

  • Jean Mbogning

    (University of Vienna, Department of Chromosome Biology
    McGill University, Department of Pharmacology and Therapeutics)

  • Franz Klein

    (University of Vienna, Department of Chromosome Biology)

Abstract

Meiotic recombination is essential for chromosome segregation at meiosis and fertility. It is initiated by programmed DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) introduced by Spo11, a eukaryotic homologue of an archaeal topoisomerase (Topo VIA)1. Here we describe previously uncharacterized Spo11-induced lesions, 34 to several hundred base pair-long gaps, which are generated by coordinated pairs of DSBs termed double DSBs. Isolation and genome-wide mapping of the resulting fragments with single base-pair precision revealed enrichment at DSB hotspots but also a widely dispersed distribution across the genome. Spo11 prefers to cut sequences with similarity to a DNA-bending motif2, which indicates that bendability contributes to the choice of cleavage site. Moreover, fragment lengths have a periodicity of approximately (10.4n + 3) base pairs, which indicates that Spo11 favours cleavage on the same face of underwound DNA. Consistently, double DSB signals overlap and correlate with topoisomerase II-binding sites, which points to a role for topological stress and DNA crossings in break formation, and suggests a model for the formation of DSBs and double DSBs in which Spo11 traps two DNA strands. Double DSB gaps, which make up an estimated 20% of all initiation events, can account for full gene conversion events that are independent of both Msh2-dependent heteroduplex repair3,4 and the MutLγ endonuclease4. Because non-homologous gap repair results in deletions, and ectopically re-integrated double DSB fragments result in insertions, the formation of double DSBs is a potential source of evolutionary diversity and pathogenic germline aberrations.

Suggested Citation

  • Silvia Prieler & Doris Chen & Lingzhi Huang & Elisa Mayrhofer & Soma Zsótér & Magdalena Vesely & Jean Mbogning & Franz Klein, 2021. "Spo11 generates gaps through concerted cuts at sites of topological stress," Nature, Nature, vol. 594(7864), pages 577-582, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:nat:nature:v:594:y:2021:i:7864:d:10.1038_s41586-021-03632-x
    DOI: 10.1038/s41586-021-03632-x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-021-03632-x
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1038/s41586-021-03632-x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Tomoki Tamai & Giordano Reginato & Ryusei Ojiri & Issei Morita & Alexandra Avrutis & Petr Cejka & Miki Shinohara & Katsunori Sugimoto, 2024. "Sae2 controls Mre11 endo- and exonuclease activities by different mechanisms," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 15(1), pages 1-15, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nat:nature:v:594:y:2021:i:7864:d:10.1038_s41586-021-03632-x. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.nature.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.