IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/nat/nature/v592y2021i7853d10.1038_s41586-021-03273-0.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Cell competition constitutes a barrier for interspecies chimerism

Author

Listed:
  • Canbin Zheng

    (Sun Yat-sen University
    University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center)

  • Yingying Hu

    (University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center
    BGI-Shenzhen
    Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Genome Read and Write, BGI-Shenzhen)

  • Masahiro Sakurai

    (University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center)

  • Carlos A. Pinzon-Arteaga

    (University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center)

  • Jie Li

    (BGI-Shenzhen
    Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Genome Read and Write, BGI-Shenzhen)

  • Yulei Wei

    (University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center
    Wuyi University
    International Healthcare Innovation Institute)

  • Daiji Okamura

    (Kindai University)

  • Benjamin Ravaux

    (University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center)

  • Haley Rose Barlow

    (University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center)

  • Leqian Yu

    (University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center)

  • Hai-Xi Sun

    (BGI-Shenzhen
    Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Genome Read and Write, BGI-Shenzhen)

  • Elizabeth H. Chen

    (University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center
    University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center
    University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center)

  • Ying Gu

    (BGI-Shenzhen
    Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Genome Read and Write, BGI-Shenzhen)

  • Jun Wu

    (University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center
    University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center)

Abstract

Cell competition involves a conserved fitness-sensing process during which fitter cells eliminate neighbouring less-fit but viable cells1. Cell competition has been proposed as a surveillance mechanism to ensure normal development and tissue homeostasis, and has also been suggested to act as a barrier to interspecies chimerism2. However, cell competition has not been studied in an interspecies context during early development owing to the lack of an in vitro model. Here we developed an interspecies pluripotent stem cell (PSC) co-culture strategy and uncovered a previously unknown mode of cell competition between species. Interspecies competition between PSCs occurred in primed but not naive pluripotent cells, and between evolutionarily distant species. By comparative transcriptome analysis, we found that genes related to the NF-κB signalling pathway, among others, were upregulated in less-fit ‘loser’ human cells. Genetic inactivation of a core component (P65, also known as RELA) and an upstream regulator (MYD88) of the NF-κB complex in human cells could overcome the competition between human and mouse PSCs, thereby improving the survival and chimerism of human cells in early mouse embryos. These insights into cell competition pave the way for the study of evolutionarily conserved mechanisms that underlie competitive cell interactions during early mammalian development. Suppression of interspecies PSC competition may facilitate the generation of human tissues in animals.

Suggested Citation

  • Canbin Zheng & Yingying Hu & Masahiro Sakurai & Carlos A. Pinzon-Arteaga & Jie Li & Yulei Wei & Daiji Okamura & Benjamin Ravaux & Haley Rose Barlow & Leqian Yu & Hai-Xi Sun & Elizabeth H. Chen & Ying , 2021. "Cell competition constitutes a barrier for interspecies chimerism," Nature, Nature, vol. 592(7853), pages 272-276, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:nat:nature:v:592:y:2021:i:7853:d:10.1038_s41586-021-03273-0
    DOI: 10.1038/s41586-021-03273-0
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-021-03273-0
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1038/s41586-021-03273-0?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nat:nature:v:592:y:2021:i:7853:d:10.1038_s41586-021-03273-0. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.nature.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.