IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/nat/nature/v592y2021i7852d10.1038_s41586-021-03374-w.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

DNA-driven condensation assembles the meiotic DNA break machinery

Author

Listed:
  • Corentin Claeys Bouuaert

    (Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center and Howard Hughes Medical Institute
    Université Catholique de Louvain)

  • Stephen Pu

    (Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center and Howard Hughes Medical Institute)

  • Juncheng Wang

    (Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center)

  • Cédric Oger

    (Université Catholique de Louvain)

  • Dima Daccache

    (Université Catholique de Louvain)

  • Wei Xie

    (Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center)

  • Dinshaw J. Patel

    (Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center)

  • Scott Keeney

    (Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center and Howard Hughes Medical Institute)

Abstract

The accurate segregation of chromosomes during meiosis—which is critical for genome stability across sexual cycles—relies on homologous recombination initiated by DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) made by the Spo11 protein1,2. The formation of DSBs is regulated and tied to the elaboration of large-scale chromosome structures3–5, but the protein assemblies that execute and control DNA breakage are poorly understood. Here we address this through the molecular characterization of Saccharomyces cerevisiae RMM (Rec114, Mei4 and Mer2) proteins—essential, conserved components of the DSB machinery2. Each subcomplex of Rec114–Mei4 (a 2:1 heterotrimer) or Mer2 (a coiled-coil-containing homotetramer) is monodispersed in solution, but they independently condense with DNA into reversible nucleoprotein clusters that share properties with phase-separated systems. Multivalent interactions drive this condensation. Mutations that weaken protein–DNA interactions strongly disrupt both condensate formation and DSBs in vivo, and thus these processes are highly correlated. In vitro, condensates fuse into mixed RMM clusters that further recruit Spo11 complexes. Our data show how the DSB machinery self-assembles on chromosome axes to create centres of DSB activity. We propose that multilayered control of Spo11 arises from the recruitment of regulatory components and modulation of the biophysical properties of the condensates.

Suggested Citation

  • Corentin Claeys Bouuaert & Stephen Pu & Juncheng Wang & Cédric Oger & Dima Daccache & Wei Xie & Dinshaw J. Patel & Scott Keeney, 2021. "DNA-driven condensation assembles the meiotic DNA break machinery," Nature, Nature, vol. 592(7852), pages 144-149, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:nat:nature:v:592:y:2021:i:7852:d:10.1038_s41586-021-03374-w
    DOI: 10.1038/s41586-021-03374-w
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-021-03374-w
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1038/s41586-021-03374-w?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Alexandre Nore & Ariadna B. Juarez-Martinez & Julie Clément & Christine Brun & Boubou Diagouraga & Hamida Laroussi & Corinne Grey & Henri Marc Bourbon & Jan Kadlec & Thomas Robert & Bernard Massy, 2022. "TOPOVIBL-REC114 interaction regulates meiotic DNA double-strand breaks," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-19, December.
    2. Ihsan Dereli & Vladyslav Telychko & Frantzeskos Papanikos & Kavya Raveendran & Jiaqi Xu & Michiel Boekhout & Marcello Stanzione & Benjamin Neuditschko & Naga Sailaja Imjeti & Elizaveta Selezneva & Has, 2024. "Seeding the meiotic DNA break machinery and initiating recombination on chromosome axes," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 15(1), pages 1-23, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nat:nature:v:592:y:2021:i:7852:d:10.1038_s41586-021-03374-w. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.nature.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.