Author
Listed:
- Subir Biswas
(H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute)
- Gunjan Mandal
(H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute)
- Kyle K. Payne
(H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute)
- Carmen M. Anadon
(H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute)
- Chandler D. Gatenbee
(H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute)
- Ricardo A. Chaurio
(H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute)
- Tara Lee Costich
(H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute)
- Carlos Moran
(H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute)
- Carly M. Harro
(H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute)
- Kristen E. Rigolizzo
(H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute)
- Jessica A. Mine
(H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute)
- Jimena Trillo-Tinoco
(H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute)
- Naoko Sasamoto
(Brigham and Women’s Hospital and Harvard Medical School)
- Kathryn L. Terry
(Brigham and Women’s Hospital and Harvard Medical School)
- Douglas Marchion
(Brigham and Women’s Hospital and Harvard Medical School)
- Andrea Buras
(H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute)
- Robert M. Wenham
(H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute)
- Xiaoqing Yu
(H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute)
- Mary K. Townsend
(H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute)
- Shelley S. Tworoger
(H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute
Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health)
- Paulo C. Rodriguez
(H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute)
- Alexander R. Anderson
(H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute)
- Jose R. Conejo-Garcia
(H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute)
Abstract
Most ovarian cancers are infiltrated by prognostically relevant activated T cells1–3, yet exhibit low response rates to immune checkpoint inhibitors4. Memory B cell and plasma cell infiltrates have previously been associated with better outcomes in ovarian cancer5,6, but the nature and functional relevance of these responses are controversial. Here, using 3 independent cohorts that in total comprise 534 patients with high-grade serous ovarian cancer, we show that robust, protective humoral responses are dominated by the production of polyclonal IgA, which binds to polymeric IgA receptors that are universally expressed on ovarian cancer cells. Notably, tumour B-cell-derived IgA redirects myeloid cells against extracellular oncogenic drivers, which causes tumour cell death. In addition, IgA transcytosis through malignant epithelial cells elicits transcriptional changes that antagonize the RAS pathway and sensitize tumour cells to cytolytic killing by T cells, which also contributes to hindering malignant progression. Thus, tumour-antigen-specific and -antigen-independent IgA responses antagonize the growth of ovarian cancer by governing coordinated tumour cell, T cell and B cell responses. These findings provide a platform for identifying targets that are spontaneously recognized by intratumoural B-cell-derived antibodies, and suggest that immunotherapies that augment B cell responses may be more effective than approaches that focus on T cells, particularly for malignancies that are resistant to checkpoint inhibitors.
Suggested Citation
Subir Biswas & Gunjan Mandal & Kyle K. Payne & Carmen M. Anadon & Chandler D. Gatenbee & Ricardo A. Chaurio & Tara Lee Costich & Carlos Moran & Carly M. Harro & Kristen E. Rigolizzo & Jessica A. Mine , 2021.
"IgA transcytosis and antigen recognition govern ovarian cancer immunity,"
Nature, Nature, vol. 591(7850), pages 464-470, March.
Handle:
RePEc:nat:nature:v:591:y:2021:i:7850:d:10.1038_s41586-020-03144-0
DOI: 10.1038/s41586-020-03144-0
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nat:nature:v:591:y:2021:i:7850:d:10.1038_s41586-020-03144-0. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.nature.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.