Author
Listed:
- Charlene Adaken
(University of Liverpool
University of Liverpool)
- Janet T. Scott
(University of Liverpool
University of Liverpool
MRC–University of Glasgow Centre for Virus Research)
- Raman Sharma
(Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine)
- Robin Gopal
(National Infections Service, Public Health England)
- Steven Dicks
(Public Health England
National Health Service Blood and Transplant)
- Saidia Niazi
(Public Health England
National Health Service Blood and Transplant)
- Samreen Ijaz
(Public Health England
National Health Service Blood and Transplant)
- Tansy Edwards
(London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine)
- Catherine C. Smith
(University of Liverpool
Health Protection Scotland
University of Oxford, Centre for Clinical Vaccinology and Tropical Medicine)
- Christine P. Cole
(College of Medicine and Allied Health Sciences
Royal Liverpool and Broadgreen University Hospitals NHS Trust)
- Philip Kamara
(National Safe Blood Service, Ministry of Health and Sanitation)
- Osman Kargbo
(National Safe Blood Service, Ministry of Health and Sanitation)
- Heidi A. Doughty
(National Health Service Blood and Transplant
College of Medical and Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham)
- Johan Griensven
(Institute of Tropical Medicine)
- Peter W. Horby
(University of Oxford)
- Sahr M. Gevao
(National Safe Blood Service, Ministry of Health and Sanitation
University of Sierra Leone)
- Foday Sahr
(University of Sierra Leone
34 Military Hospital, Republic of Sierra Leone Armed Forces)
- Richard J. Dimelow
(GlaxoSmithKline)
- Richard S. Tedder
(University of Liverpool
Public Health England
National Health Service Blood and Transplant
Imperial College London)
- Malcolm G. Semple
(University of Liverpool
University of Liverpool)
- William A. Paxton
(University of Liverpool
University of Liverpool)
- Georgios Pollakis
(University of Liverpool
University of Liverpool)
Abstract
Neutralizing antibody function provides a foundation for the efficacy of vaccines and therapies1–3. Here, using a robust in vitro Ebola virus (EBOV) pseudo-particle infection assay and a well-defined set of solid-phase assays, we describe a wide spectrum of antibody responses in a cohort of healthy survivors of the Sierra Leone EBOV outbreak of 2013–2016. Pseudo-particle virus-neutralizing antibodies correlated with total anti-EBOV reactivity and neutralizing antibodies against live EBOV. Variant EBOV glycoproteins (1995 and 2014 strains) were similarly neutralized. During longitudinal follow-up, antibody responses fluctuated in a ‘decay–stimulation–decay’ pattern that suggests de novo restimulation by EBOV antigens after recovery. A pharmacodynamic model of antibody reactivity identified a decay half-life of 77–100 days and a doubling time of 46–86 days in a high proportion of survivors. The highest antibody reactivity was observed around 200 days after an individual had recovered. The model suggests that EBOV antibody reactivity declines over 0.5–2 years after recovery. In a high proportion of healthy survivors, antibody responses undergo rapid restimulation. Vigilant follow-up of survivors and possible elective de novo antigenic stimulation by vaccine immunization should be considered in order to prevent EBOV viral recrudescence in recovering individuals and thereby to mitigate the potential risk of reseeding an outbreak.
Suggested Citation
Charlene Adaken & Janet T. Scott & Raman Sharma & Robin Gopal & Steven Dicks & Saidia Niazi & Samreen Ijaz & Tansy Edwards & Catherine C. Smith & Christine P. Cole & Philip Kamara & Osman Kargbo & Hei, 2021.
"Ebola virus antibody decay–stimulation in a high proportion of survivors,"
Nature, Nature, vol. 590(7846), pages 468-472, February.
Handle:
RePEc:nat:nature:v:590:y:2021:i:7846:d:10.1038_s41586-020-03146-y
DOI: 10.1038/s41586-020-03146-y
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nat:nature:v:590:y:2021:i:7846:d:10.1038_s41586-020-03146-y. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.nature.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.