IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/nat/nature/v590y2021i7844d10.1038_s41586-020-03044-3.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Cortical response selectivity derives from strength in numbers of synapses

Author

Listed:
  • Benjamin Scholl

    (Max Planck Florida Institute for Neuroscience
    Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania)

  • Connon I. Thomas

    (Max Planck Florida Institute for Neuroscience)

  • Melissa A. Ryan

    (Max Planck Florida Institute for Neuroscience)

  • Naomi Kamasawa

    (Max Planck Florida Institute for Neuroscience)

  • David Fitzpatrick

    (Max Planck Florida Institute for Neuroscience)

Abstract

Single neocortical neurons are driven by populations of excitatory inputs, which form the basis of neuronal selectivity to features of sensory input. Excitatory connections are thought to mature during development through activity-dependent Hebbian plasticity1, whereby similarity between presynaptic and postsynaptic activity selectively strengthens some synapses and weakens others2. Evidence in support of this process includes measurements of synaptic ultrastructure and in vitro and in vivo physiology and imaging studies3–8. These corroborating lines of evidence lead to the prediction that a small number of strong synaptic inputs drive neuronal selectivity, whereas weak synaptic inputs are less correlated with the somatic output and modulate activity overall6,7. Supporting evidence from cortical circuits, however, has been limited to measurements of neighbouring, connected cell pairs, raising the question of whether this prediction holds for a broad range of synapses converging onto cortical neurons. Here we measure the strengths of functionally characterized excitatory inputs contacting single pyramidal neurons in ferret primary visual cortex (V1) by combining in vivo two-photon synaptic imaging and post hoc electron microscopy. Using electron microscopy reconstruction of individual synapses as a metric of strength, we find no evidence that strong synapses have a predominant role in the selectivity of cortical neuron responses to visual stimuli. Instead, selectivity appears to arise from the total number of synapses activated by different stimuli. Moreover, spatial clustering of co-active inputs appears to be reserved for weaker synapses, enhancing the contribution of weak synapses to somatic responses. Our results challenge the role of Hebbian mechanisms in shaping neuronal selectivity in cortical circuits, and suggest that selectivity reflects the co-activation of large populations of presynaptic neurons with similar properties and a mixture of strengths.

Suggested Citation

  • Benjamin Scholl & Connon I. Thomas & Melissa A. Ryan & Naomi Kamasawa & David Fitzpatrick, 2021. "Cortical response selectivity derives from strength in numbers of synapses," Nature, Nature, vol. 590(7844), pages 111-114, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:nat:nature:v:590:y:2021:i:7844:d:10.1038_s41586-020-03044-3
    DOI: 10.1038/s41586-020-03044-3
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-020-03044-3
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1038/s41586-020-03044-3?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Zhiwei Xu & Erez Geron & Luis M. Pérez-Cuesta & Yang Bai & Wen-Biao Gan, 2023. "Generalized extinction of fear memory depends on co-allocation of synaptic plasticity in dendrites," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-17, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nat:nature:v:590:y:2021:i:7844:d:10.1038_s41586-020-03044-3. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.nature.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.