Author
Listed:
- Nitin S. Chouhan
(Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania
Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania)
- Leslie C. Griffith
(Brandeis University)
- Paula Haynes
(Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania
Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania)
- Amita Sehgal
(Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania
Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania)
Abstract
Sleep remains a major mystery of biology, with little understood about its basic function. One of the most commonly proposed functions of sleep is the consolidation of memory1–3. However, as conditions such as starvation require the organism to be awake and active4, the ability to switch to a memory consolidation mechanism that is not contingent on sleep may confer an evolutionary advantage. Here we identify an adaptive circuit-based mechanism that enables Drosophila to form sleep-dependent and sleep-independent memory. Flies fed after appetitive conditioning needed increased sleep for memory consolidation, but flies starved after training did not require sleep to form memories. Memory in fed flies is mediated by the anterior–posterior α′/β′ neurons of the mushroom body, while memory under starvation is mediated by medial α′/β′ neurons. Sleep-dependent and sleep-independent memory rely on distinct dopaminergic neurons and corresponding mushroom body output neurons. However, sleep and memory are coupled such that mushroom body neurons required for sleep-dependent memory also promote sleep. Flies lacking Neuropeptide F display sleep-dependent memory even when starved, suggesting that circuit selection is determined by hunger. This plasticity in memory circuits enables flies to retain essential information in changing environments.
Suggested Citation
Nitin S. Chouhan & Leslie C. Griffith & Paula Haynes & Amita Sehgal, 2021.
"Availability of food determines the need for sleep in memory consolidation,"
Nature, Nature, vol. 589(7843), pages 582-585, January.
Handle:
RePEc:nat:nature:v:589:y:2021:i:7843:d:10.1038_s41586-020-2997-y
DOI: 10.1038/s41586-020-2997-y
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nat:nature:v:589:y:2021:i:7843:d:10.1038_s41586-020-2997-y. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.nature.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.