IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/nat/nature/v587y2020i7835d10.1038_s41586-020-2903-7.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Sensory pollutants alter bird phenology and fitness across a continent

Author

Listed:
  • Masayuki Senzaki

    (California Polytechnic State University
    Hokkaido University)

  • Jesse R. Barber

    (Boise State University)

  • Jennifer N. Phillips

    (California Polytechnic State University
    Texas A&M San Antonio)

  • Neil H. Carter

    (University of Michigan)

  • Caren B. Cooper

    (North Carolina State University
    North Carolina State University)

  • Mark A. Ditmer

    (University of Michigan)

  • Kurt M. Fristrup

    (National Park Service Natural Sounds and Night Skies Division)

  • Christopher J. W. McClure

    (Boise State University
    The Peregrine Fund)

  • Daniel J. Mennitt

    (Exponent)

  • Luke P. Tyrrell

    (State University of New York Plattsburgh)

  • Jelena Vukomanovic

    (North Carolina State University
    North Carolina State University)

  • Ashley A. Wilson

    (California Polytechnic State University)

  • Clinton D. Francis

    (California Polytechnic State University)

Abstract

Expansion of anthropogenic noise and night lighting across our planet1,2 is of increasing conservation concern3–6. Despite growing knowledge of physiological and behavioural responses to these stimuli from single-species and local-scale studies, whether these pollutants affect fitness is less clear, as is how and why species vary in their sensitivity to these anthropic stressors. Here we leverage a large citizen science dataset paired with high-resolution noise and light data from across the contiguous United States to assess how these stimuli affect reproductive success in 142 bird species. We find responses to both sensory pollutants linked to the functional traits and habitat affiliations of species. For example, overall nest success was negatively correlated with noise among birds in closed environments. Species-specific changes in reproductive timing and hatching success in response to noise exposure were explained by vocalization frequency, nesting location and diet. Additionally, increased light-gathering ability of species’ eyes was associated with stronger advancements in reproductive timing in response to light exposure, potentially creating phenological mismatches7. Unexpectedly, better light-gathering ability was linked to reduced clutch failure and increased overall nest success in response to light exposure, raising important questions about how responses to sensory pollutants counteract or exacerbate responses to other aspects of global change, such as climate warming. These findings demonstrate that anthropogenic noise and light can substantially affect breeding bird phenology and fitness, and underscore the need to consider sensory pollutants alongside traditional dimensions of the environment that typically inform biodiversity conservation.

Suggested Citation

  • Masayuki Senzaki & Jesse R. Barber & Jennifer N. Phillips & Neil H. Carter & Caren B. Cooper & Mark A. Ditmer & Kurt M. Fristrup & Christopher J. W. McClure & Daniel J. Mennitt & Luke P. Tyrrell & Jel, 2020. "Sensory pollutants alter bird phenology and fitness across a continent," Nature, Nature, vol. 587(7835), pages 605-609, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:nat:nature:v:587:y:2020:i:7835:d:10.1038_s41586-020-2903-7
    DOI: 10.1038/s41586-020-2903-7
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-020-2903-7
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1038/s41586-020-2903-7?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Qike Wang & Genting Liu & Liping Yan & Wentian Xu & Douglas J. Hilton & Xianhui Liu & Wenya Pei & Xinyu Li & Jinbiao Wu & Haifeng Zhao & Dong Zhang & Mark A. Elgar, 2023. "Short-term particulate matter contamination severely compromises insect antennal olfactory perception," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-10, December.
    2. Martha Maria Sander & Dieter Thomas Tietze, 2022. "Impacts of Traffic Infrastructure on Urban Bird Communities: A Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(24), pages 1-16, December.
    3. Andrew D Cronin & Judith A H Smit & Wouter Halfwerk, 2022. "Anthropogenic noise and light alter temporal but not spatial breeding behavior in a wild frog [Lack of consistent responses to aircraft noise in dawn song timing of bird populations near tropical a," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 33(6), pages 1115-1122.
    4. Conor C. Taff & J. Ryan. Shipley, 2023. "Inconsistent shifts in warming and temperature variability are linked to reduced avian fitness," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-12, December.
    5. Giulio Arcangeli & Lucrezia Ginevra Lulli & Veronica Traversini & Simone De Sio & Emanuele Cannizzaro & Raymond Paul Galea & Nicola Mucci, 2022. "Neurobehavioral Alterations from Noise Exposure in Animals: A Systematic Review," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(1), pages 1-21, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nat:nature:v:587:y:2020:i:7835:d:10.1038_s41586-020-2903-7. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.nature.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.