IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/nat/nature/v587y2020i7835d10.1038_s41586-020-2748-0.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Structural basis for sequestration and autoinhibition of cGAS by chromatin

Author

Listed:
  • Sebastian Michalski

    (Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität
    Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität)

  • Carina C. de Oliveira Mann

    (Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität
    Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität)

  • Che A. Stafford

    (Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität
    Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität)

  • Gregor Witte

    (Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität
    Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität)

  • Joseph Bartho

    (Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität
    Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität)

  • Katja Lammens

    (Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität
    Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität)

  • Veit Hornung

    (Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität
    Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität)

  • Karl-Peter Hopfner

    (Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität
    Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität)

Abstract

Cyclic GMP–AMP synthase (cGAS) is an innate immune sensor for cytosolic microbial DNA1. After binding DNA, cGAS synthesizes the messenger 2′3′-cyclic GMP–AMP (cGAMP)2–4, which triggers cell-autonomous defence and the production of type I interferons and pro-inflammatory cytokines via the activation of STING5. In addition to responding to cytosolic microbial DNA, cGAS also recognizes mislocalized cytosolic self-DNA and has been implicated in autoimmunity and sterile inflammation6,7. Specificity towards pathogen- or damage-associated DNA was thought to be caused by cytosolic confinement. However, recent findings place cGAS robustly in the nucleus8–10, where tight tethering of chromatin is important to prevent autoreactivity to self-DNA8. Here we show how cGAS is sequestered and inhibited by chromatin. We provide a cryo-electron microscopy structure of the cGAS catalytic domain bound to a nucleosome, which shows that cGAS does not interact with the nucleosomal DNA, but instead interacts with histone 2A–histone 2B, and is tightly anchored to the ‘acidic patch’. The interaction buries the cGAS DNA-binding site B, and blocks the formation of active cGAS dimers. The acidic patch robustly outcompetes agonistic DNA for binding to cGAS, which suggests that nucleosome sequestration can efficiently inhibit cGAS, even when accessible DNA is nearby, such as in actively transcribed genomic regions. Our results show how nuclear cGAS is sequestered by chromatin and provides a mechanism for preventing autoreactivity to nuclear self-DNA.

Suggested Citation

  • Sebastian Michalski & Carina C. de Oliveira Mann & Che A. Stafford & Gregor Witte & Joseph Bartho & Katja Lammens & Veit Hornung & Karl-Peter Hopfner, 2020. "Structural basis for sequestration and autoinhibition of cGAS by chromatin," Nature, Nature, vol. 587(7835), pages 678-682, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:nat:nature:v:587:y:2020:i:7835:d:10.1038_s41586-020-2748-0
    DOI: 10.1038/s41586-020-2748-0
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-020-2748-0
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1038/s41586-020-2748-0?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Lina Wang & Siru Li & Kai Wang & Na Wang & Qiaoling Liu & Zhen Sun & Li Wang & Lulu Wang & Quentin Liu & Chengli Song & Caigang Liu & Qingkai Yang, 2022. "DNA mechanical flexibility controls DNA potential to activate cGAS-mediated immune surveillance," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-18, December.
    2. Daipayan Banerjee & Kurt Langberg & Salar Abbas & Eric Odermatt & Praveen Yerramothu & Martin Volaric & Matthew A. Reidenbach & Kathy J. Krentz & C. Dustin Rubinstein & David L. Brautigan & Tarek Abba, 2021. "A non-canonical, interferon-independent signaling activity of cGAMP triggers DNA damage response signaling," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 12(1), pages 1-24, December.
    3. Kate M. MacDonald & Shirony Nicholson-Puthenveedu & Maha M. Tageldein & Sarika Khasnis & Cheryl H. Arrowsmith & Shane M. Harding, 2023. "Antecedent chromatin organization determines cGAS recruitment to ruptured micronuclei," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-15, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nat:nature:v:587:y:2020:i:7835:d:10.1038_s41586-020-2748-0. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.nature.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.