Author
Listed:
- Ariel Afek
(Duke University School of Medicine
Duke University School of Medicine)
- Honglue Shi
(Duke University)
- Atul Rangadurai
(Duke University School of Medicine)
- Harshit Sahay
(Duke University School of Medicine
Duke University School of Medicine)
- Alon Senitzki
(Technion–Israel Institute of Technology)
- Suela Xhani
(Georgia State University)
- Mimi Fang
(University of Iowa
University of Iowa)
- Raul Salinas
(Duke University School of Medicine)
- Zachery Mielko
(Duke University School of Medicine
Duke University School of Medicine)
- Miles A. Pufall
(University of Iowa
University of Iowa)
- Gregory M. K. Poon
(Georgia State University
Georgia State University)
- Tali E. Haran
(Technion–Israel Institute of Technology)
- Maria A. Schumacher
(Duke University School of Medicine)
- Hashim M. Al-Hashimi
(Duke University
Duke University School of Medicine)
- Raluca Gordân
(Duke University School of Medicine
Duke University School of Medicine
Duke University
Duke University School of Medicine)
Abstract
Transcription factors recognize specific genomic sequences to regulate complex gene-expression programs. Although it is well-established that transcription factors bind to specific DNA sequences using a combination of base readout and shape recognition, some fundamental aspects of protein–DNA binding remain poorly understood1,2. Many DNA-binding proteins induce changes in the structure of the DNA outside the intrinsic B-DNA envelope. However, how the energetic cost that is associated with distorting the DNA contributes to recognition has proven difficult to study, because the distorted DNA exists in low abundance in the unbound ensemble3–9. Here we use a high-throughput assay that we term SaMBA (saturation mismatch-binding assay) to investigate the role of DNA conformational penalties in transcription factor–DNA recognition. In SaMBA, mismatched base pairs are introduced to pre-induce structural distortions in the DNA that are much larger than those induced by changes in the Watson–Crick sequence. Notably, approximately 10% of mismatches increased transcription factor binding, and for each of the 22 transcription factors that were examined, at least one mismatch was found that increased the binding affinity. Mismatches also converted non-specific sites into high-affinity sites, and high-affinity sites into ‘super sites’ that exhibit stronger affinity than any known canonical binding site. Determination of high-resolution X-ray structures, combined with nuclear magnetic resonance measurements and structural analyses, showed that many of the DNA mismatches that increase binding induce distortions that are similar to those induced by protein binding—thus prepaying some of the energetic cost incurred from deforming the DNA. Our work indicates that conformational penalties are a major determinant of protein–DNA recognition, and reveals mechanisms by which mismatches can recruit transcription factors and thus modulate replication and repair activities in the cell10,11.
Suggested Citation
Ariel Afek & Honglue Shi & Atul Rangadurai & Harshit Sahay & Alon Senitzki & Suela Xhani & Mimi Fang & Raul Salinas & Zachery Mielko & Miles A. Pufall & Gregory M. K. Poon & Tali E. Haran & Maria A. S, 2020.
"DNA mismatches reveal conformational penalties in protein–DNA recognition,"
Nature, Nature, vol. 587(7833), pages 291-296, November.
Handle:
RePEc:nat:nature:v:587:y:2020:i:7833:d:10.1038_s41586-020-2843-2
DOI: 10.1038/s41586-020-2843-2
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.
Citations
Citations are extracted by the
CitEc Project, subscribe to its
RSS feed for this item.
Cited by:
- Erika Schaudy & Kathrin Hölz & Jory Lietard & Mark M. Somoza, 2022.
"Simple synthesis of massively parallel RNA microarrays via enzymatic conversion from DNA microarrays,"
Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-9, December.
- Jinsen Li & Tsu-Pei Chiu & Remo Rohs, 2024.
"Predicting DNA structure using a deep learning method,"
Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 15(1), pages 1-12, December.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nat:nature:v:587:y:2020:i:7833:d:10.1038_s41586-020-2843-2. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.nature.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.