IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/nat/nature/v586y2020i7830d10.1038_s41586-020-2785-8.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The genomic landscapes of individual melanocytes from human skin

Author

Listed:
  • Jessica Tang

    (University of California San Francisco
    University of California San Francisco)

  • Eleanor Fewings

    (University of California San Francisco
    University of California San Francisco)

  • Darwin Chang

    (University of California San Francisco
    University of California San Francisco)

  • Hanlin Zeng

    (University of Utah School of Medicine)

  • Shanshan Liu

    (University of California San Francisco
    University of California San Francisco)

  • Aparna Jorapur

    (University of California San Francisco
    University of California San Francisco)

  • Rachel L. Belote

    (University of Utah School of Medicine
    University of Utah)

  • Andrew S. McNeal

    (University of California San Francisco
    University of California San Francisco)

  • Tuyet M. Tan

    (University of California San Francisco
    University of California San Francisco)

  • Iwei Yeh

    (University of California San Francisco
    University of California San Francisco)

  • Sarah T. Arron

    (University of California San Francisco
    University of California San Francisco)

  • Robert L. Judson-Torres

    (University of Utah School of Medicine
    University of Utah)

  • Boris C. Bastian

    (University of California San Francisco
    University of California San Francisco)

  • A. Hunter Shain

    (University of California San Francisco
    University of California San Francisco)

Abstract

Every cell in the human body has a unique set of somatic mutations, but it remains difficult to comprehensively genotype an individual cell1. Here we describe ways to overcome this obstacle in the context of normal human skin, thus offering a glimpse into the genomic landscapes of individual melanocytes from human skin. As expected, sun-shielded melanocytes had fewer mutations than sun-exposed melanocytes. However, melanocytes from chronically sun-exposed skin (for example, the face) had a lower mutation burden than melanocytes from intermittently sun-exposed skin (for example, the back). Melanocytes located adjacent to a skin cancer had higher mutation burdens than melanocytes from donors without skin cancer, implying that the mutation burden of normal skin can be used to measure cumulative sun damage and risk of skin cancer. Moreover, melanocytes from healthy skin commonly contained pathogenic mutations, although these mutations tended to be weakly oncogenic, probably explaining why they did not give rise to discernible lesions. Phylogenetic analyses identified groups of related melanocytes, suggesting that melanocytes spread throughout skin as fields of clonally related cells that are invisible to the naked eye. Overall, our results uncover the genomic landscapes of individual melanocytes, providing key insights into the causes and origins of melanoma.

Suggested Citation

  • Jessica Tang & Eleanor Fewings & Darwin Chang & Hanlin Zeng & Shanshan Liu & Aparna Jorapur & Rachel L. Belote & Andrew S. McNeal & Tuyet M. Tan & Iwei Yeh & Sarah T. Arron & Robert L. Judson-Torres &, 2020. "The genomic landscapes of individual melanocytes from human skin," Nature, Nature, vol. 586(7830), pages 600-605, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:nat:nature:v:586:y:2020:i:7830:d:10.1038_s41586-020-2785-8
    DOI: 10.1038/s41586-020-2785-8
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-020-2785-8
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1038/s41586-020-2785-8?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nat:nature:v:586:y:2020:i:7830:d:10.1038_s41586-020-2785-8. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.nature.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.