IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/nat/nature/v586y2020i7829d10.1038_s41586-020-2812-9.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Relatives of rubella virus in diverse mammals

Author

Listed:
  • Andrew J. Bennett

    (University of Wisconsin-Madison)

  • Adrian C. Paskey

    (Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences
    Leidos
    Naval Medical Research Center–Frederick, Fort Detrick)

  • Arnt Ebinger

    (Friedrich-Loeffler-Institut)

  • Florian Pfaff

    (Friedrich-Loeffler-Institut)

  • Grit Priemer

    (Food Safety and Fisheries)

  • Dirk Höper

    (Friedrich-Loeffler-Institut)

  • Angele Breithaupt

    (Friedrich-Loeffler-Institut)

  • Elisa Heuser

    (Friedrich-Loeffler-Institut
    Hamburg-Lübeck-Borstel-Insel Riems)

  • Rainer G. Ulrich

    (Friedrich-Loeffler-Institut
    Hamburg-Lübeck-Borstel-Insel Riems)

  • Jens H. Kuhn

    (National Institutes of Health, Fort Detrick)

  • Kimberly A. Bishop-Lilly

    (Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences
    Naval Medical Research Center–Frederick, Fort Detrick)

  • Martin Beer

    (Friedrich-Loeffler-Institut)

  • Tony L. Goldberg

    (University of Wisconsin-Madison
    University of Wisconsin-Madison)

Abstract

Since 1814, when rubella was first described, the origins of the disease and its causative agent, rubella virus (Matonaviridae: Rubivirus), have remained unclear1. Here we describe ruhugu virus and rustrela virus in Africa and Europe, respectively, which are, to our knowledge, the first known relatives of rubella virus. Ruhugu virus, which is the closest relative of rubella virus, was found in apparently healthy cyclops leaf-nosed bats (Hipposideros cyclops) in Uganda. Rustrela virus, which is an outgroup to the clade that comprises rubella and ruhugu viruses, was found in acutely encephalitic placental and marsupial animals at a zoo in Germany and in wild yellow-necked field mice (Apodemus flavicollis) at and near the zoo. Ruhugu and rustrela viruses share an identical genomic architecture with rubella virus2,3. The amino acid sequences of four putative B cell epitopes in the fusion (E1) protein of the rubella, ruhugu and rustrela viruses and two putative T cell epitopes in the capsid protein of the rubella and ruhugu viruses are moderately to highly conserved4–6. Modelling of E1 homotrimers in the post-fusion state predicts that ruhugu and rubella viruses have a similar capacity for fusion with the host-cell membrane5. Together, these findings show that some members of the family Matonaviridae can cross substantial barriers between host species and that rubella virus probably has a zoonotic origin. Our findings raise concerns about future zoonotic transmission of rubella-like viruses, but will facilitate comparative studies and animal models of rubella and congenital rubella syndrome.

Suggested Citation

  • Andrew J. Bennett & Adrian C. Paskey & Arnt Ebinger & Florian Pfaff & Grit Priemer & Dirk Höper & Angele Breithaupt & Elisa Heuser & Rainer G. Ulrich & Jens H. Kuhn & Kimberly A. Bishop-Lilly & Martin, 2020. "Relatives of rubella virus in diverse mammals," Nature, Nature, vol. 586(7829), pages 424-428, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:nat:nature:v:586:y:2020:i:7829:d:10.1038_s41586-020-2812-9
    DOI: 10.1038/s41586-020-2812-9
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-020-2812-9
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1038/s41586-020-2812-9?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nat:nature:v:586:y:2020:i:7829:d:10.1038_s41586-020-2812-9. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.nature.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.