Author
Listed:
- Toshiaki Teratani
(Keio University School of Medicine)
- Yohei Mikami
(Keio University School of Medicine)
- Nobuhiro Nakamoto
(Keio University School of Medicine)
- Takahiro Suzuki
(Keio University School of Medicine
Research Laboratory)
- Yosuke Harada
(Keio University School of Medicine)
- Koji Okabayashi
(Keio University School of Medicine)
- Yuya Hagihara
(Keio University School of Medicine)
- Nobuhito Taniki
(Keio University School of Medicine)
- Keita Kohno
(Kyushu University)
- Shinsuke Shibata
(Keio University School of Medicine
Keio University School of Medicine)
- Kentaro Miyamoto
(Keio University School of Medicine
Research Laboratory)
- Harumichi Ishigame
(RIKEN Center for Integrative Medical Sciences)
- Po-Sung Chu
(Keio University School of Medicine)
- Tomohisa Sujino
(Keio University School of Medicine)
- Wataru Suda
(RIKEN Center for Integrative Medical Sciences)
- Masahira Hattori
(RIKEN Center for Integrative Medical Sciences
Waseda University)
- Minoru Matsui
(Aozora Asakusa Clinic)
- Takaharu Okada
(RIKEN Center for Integrative Medical Sciences
Yokohama City University)
- Hideyuki Okano
(Keio University School of Medicine)
- Masayuki Inoue
(The University of Tokyo)
- Toshihiko Yada
(Kobe Biotechnology Research and Human Resource Development Center)
- Yuko Kitagawa
(Keio University School of Medicine)
- Akihiko Yoshimura
(Keio University School of Medicine)
- Mamoru Tanida
(Kanazawa Medical University)
- Makoto Tsuda
(Kyushu University)
- Yusaku Iwasaki
(Kyoto Prefectural University)
- Takanori Kanai
(Keio University School of Medicine
AMED-CREST, Japan Agency for Medical Research and Development)
Abstract
Recent clinical and experimental evidence has evoked the concept of the gut–brain axis to explain mutual interactions between the central nervous system and gut microbiota that are closely associated with the bidirectional effects of inflammatory bowel disease and central nervous system disorders1–4. Despite recent advances in our understanding of neuroimmune interactions, it remains unclear how the gut and brain communicate to maintain gut immune homeostasis, including in the induction and maintenance of peripheral regulatory T cells (pTreg cells), and what environmental cues prompt the host to protect itself from development of inflammatory bowel diseases. Here we report a liver–brain–gut neural arc that ensures the proper differentiation and maintenance of pTreg cells in the gut. The hepatic vagal sensory afferent nerves are responsible for indirectly sensing the gut microenvironment and relaying the sensory inputs to the nucleus tractus solitarius of the brainstem, and ultimately to the vagal parasympathetic nerves and enteric neurons. Surgical and chemical perturbation of the vagal sensory afferents at the hepatic afferent level reduced the abundance of colonic pTreg cells; this was attributed to decreased aldehyde dehydrogenase (ALDH) expression and retinoic acid synthesis by intestinal antigen-presenting cells. Activation of muscarinic acetylcholine receptors directly induced ALDH gene expression in both human and mouse colonic antigen-presenting cells, whereas genetic ablation of these receptors abolished the stimulation of antigen-presenting cells in vitro. Disruption of left vagal sensory afferents from the liver to the brainstem in mouse models of colitis reduced the colonic pTreg cell pool, resulting in increased susceptibility to colitis. These results demonstrate that the novel vago-vagal liver–brain–gut reflex arc controls the number of pTreg cells and maintains gut homeostasis. Intervention in this autonomic feedback feedforward system could help in the development of therapeutic strategies to treat or prevent immunological disorders of the gut.
Suggested Citation
Toshiaki Teratani & Yohei Mikami & Nobuhiro Nakamoto & Takahiro Suzuki & Yosuke Harada & Koji Okabayashi & Yuya Hagihara & Nobuhito Taniki & Keita Kohno & Shinsuke Shibata & Kentaro Miyamoto & Harumic, 2020.
"The liver–brain–gut neural arc maintains the Treg cell niche in the gut,"
Nature, Nature, vol. 585(7826), pages 591-596, September.
Handle:
RePEc:nat:nature:v:585:y:2020:i:7826:d:10.1038_s41586-020-2425-3
DOI: 10.1038/s41586-020-2425-3
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nat:nature:v:585:y:2020:i:7826:d:10.1038_s41586-020-2425-3. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.nature.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.