IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/nat/nature/v583y2020i7816d10.1038_s41586-020-2377-7.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A giant soft-shelled egg from the Late Cretaceous of Antarctica

Author

Listed:
  • Lucas J. Legendre

    (University of Texas at Austin)

  • David Rubilar-Rogers

    (Área Paleontología, Museo Nacional de Historia Natural)

  • Grace M. Musser

    (University of Texas at Austin)

  • Sarah N. Davis

    (University of Texas at Austin)

  • Rodrigo A. Otero

    (Departamento de Biología, Facultad de Ciencias, Universidad de Chile)

  • Alexander O. Vargas

    (Departamento de Biología, Facultad de Ciencias, Universidad de Chile)

  • Julia A. Clarke

    (University of Texas at Austin)

Abstract

Egg size and structure reflect important constraints on the reproductive and life-history characteristics of vertebrates1. More than two-thirds of all extant amniotes lay eggs2. During the Mesozoic era (around 250 million to 65 million years ago), body sizes reached extremes; nevertheless, the largest known egg belongs to the only recently extinct elephant bird3, which was roughly 66 million years younger than the last nonavian dinosaurs and giant marine reptiles. Here we report a new type of egg discovered in nearshore marine deposits from the Late Cretaceous period (roughly 68 million years ago) of Antarctica. It exceeds all nonavian dinosaur eggs in volume and differs from them in structure. Although the elephant bird egg is slightly larger, its eggshell is roughly five times thicker and shows a substantial prismatic layer and complex pore structure4. By contrast, the new fossil, visibly collapsed and folded, presents a thin eggshell with a layered structure that lacks a prismatic layer and distinct pores, and is similar to that of most extant lizards and snakes (Lepidosauria)5. The identity of the animal that laid the egg is unknown, but these preserved morphologies are consistent with the skeletal remains of mosasaurs (large marine lepidosaurs) found nearby. They are not consistent with described morphologies of dinosaur eggs of a similar size class. Phylogenetic analyses of traits for 259 lepidosaur species plus outgroups suggest that the egg belonged to an individual that was at least 7 metres long, hypothesized to be a giant marine reptile, all clades of which have previously been proposed to show live birth6. Such a large egg with a relatively thin eggshell may reflect derived constraints associated with body shape, reproductive investment linked with gigantism, and lepidosaurian viviparity, in which a ‘vestigial’ egg is laid and hatches immediately7.

Suggested Citation

  • Lucas J. Legendre & David Rubilar-Rogers & Grace M. Musser & Sarah N. Davis & Rodrigo A. Otero & Alexander O. Vargas & Julia A. Clarke, 2020. "A giant soft-shelled egg from the Late Cretaceous of Antarctica," Nature, Nature, vol. 583(7816), pages 411-414, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:nat:nature:v:583:y:2020:i:7816:d:10.1038_s41586-020-2377-7
    DOI: 10.1038/s41586-020-2377-7
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-020-2377-7
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1038/s41586-020-2377-7?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nat:nature:v:583:y:2020:i:7816:d:10.1038_s41586-020-2377-7. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.nature.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.