IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/nat/nature/v583y2020i7815d10.1038_s41586-020-2384-8.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Cambrian crown annelid reconciles phylogenomics and the fossil record

Author

Listed:
  • Hong Chen

    (Yunnan University
    Yunnan University
    Liupanshui Normal University)

  • Luke A. Parry

    (Yale University
    University of Oxford)

  • Jakob Vinther

    (University of Bristol
    University of Bristol)

  • Dayou Zhai

    (Yunnan University
    Yunnan University)

  • Xianguang Hou

    (Yunnan University
    Yunnan University)

  • Xiaoya Ma

    (Yunnan University
    Yunnan University
    University of Exeter)

Abstract

The phylum of annelids is one of the most disparate animal phyla and encompasses ambush predators, suspension feeders and terrestrial earthworms1. The early evolution of annelids remains obscure or controversial2,3, partly owing to discordance between molecular phylogenies and fossils2,4. Annelid fossils from the Cambrian period have morphologies that indicate epibenthic lifestyles, whereas phylogenomics recovers sessile, infaunal and tubicolous taxa as an early diverging grade5. Magelonidae and Oweniidae (Palaeoannelida1) are the sister group of all other annelids but contrast with Cambrian taxa in both lifestyle and gross morphology2,6. Here we describe a new fossil polychaete (bristle worm) from the early Cambrian Canglangpu formation7 that we name Dannychaeta tucolus, which is preserved within delicate, dwelling tubes that were originally organic. The head has a well-defined spade-shaped prostomium with elongated ventrolateral palps. The body has a wide, stout thorax and elongated abdomen with biramous parapodia with parapodial lamellae. This character combination is shared with extant Magelonidae, and phylogenetic analyses recover Dannychaeta within Palaeoannelida. To our knowledge, Dannychaeta is the oldest polychaete that unambiguously belongs to crown annelids, providing a constraint on the tempo of annelid evolution and revealing unrecognized ecological and morphological diversity in ancient annelids.

Suggested Citation

  • Hong Chen & Luke A. Parry & Jakob Vinther & Dayou Zhai & Xianguang Hou & Xiaoya Ma, 2020. "A Cambrian crown annelid reconciles phylogenomics and the fossil record," Nature, Nature, vol. 583(7815), pages 249-252, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:nat:nature:v:583:y:2020:i:7815:d:10.1038_s41586-020-2384-8
    DOI: 10.1038/s41586-020-2384-8
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-020-2384-8
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1038/s41586-020-2384-8?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Karma Nanglu & Rudy Lerosey-Aubril & James C. Weaver & Javier Ortega-Hernández, 2023. "A mid-Cambrian tunicate and the deep origin of the ascidiacean body plan," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-9, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nat:nature:v:583:y:2020:i:7815:d:10.1038_s41586-020-2384-8. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.nature.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.