Author
Listed:
- Lara M. Cassidy
(Trinity College Dublin)
- Ros Ó Maoldúin
(Trinity College Dublin
National University of Ireland Galway
Archaeological Management Solutions)
- Thomas Kador
(University College London)
- Ann Lynch
(Heritage and the Gaeltacht)
- Carleton Jones
(National University of Ireland Galway)
- Peter C. Woodman
(University College Cork)
- Eileen Murphy
(Queen’s University Belfast)
- Greer Ramsey
(National Museums NI)
- Marion Dowd
(CERIS, School of Science, Institute of Technology Sligo)
- Alice Noonan
(Trinity College Dublin)
- Ciarán Campbell
(Trinity College Dublin)
- Eppie R. Jones
(Trinity College Dublin
University of Cambridge
Genomics Medicine Ireland)
- Valeria Mattiangeli
(Trinity College Dublin)
- Daniel G. Bradley
(Trinity College Dublin)
Abstract
The nature and distribution of political power in Europe during the Neolithic era remains poorly understood1. During this period, many societies began to invest heavily in building monuments, which suggests an increase in social organization. The scale and sophistication of megalithic architecture along the Atlantic seaboard, culminating in the great passage tomb complexes, is particularly impressive2. Although co-operative ideology has often been emphasised as a driver of megalith construction1, the human expenditure required to erect the largest monuments has led some researchers to emphasize hierarchy3—of which the most extreme case is a small elite marshalling the labour of the masses. Here we present evidence that a social stratum of this type was established during the Neolithic period in Ireland. We sampled 44 whole genomes, among which we identify the adult son of a first-degree incestuous union from remains that were discovered within the most elaborate recess of the Newgrange passage tomb. Socially sanctioned matings of this nature are very rare, and are documented almost exclusively among politico-religious elites4—specifically within polygynous and patrilineal royal families that are headed by god-kings5,6. We identify relatives of this individual within two other major complexes of passage tombs 150 km to the west of Newgrange, as well as dietary differences and fine-scale haplotypic structure (which is unprecedented in resolution for a prehistoric population) between passage tomb samples and the larger dataset, which together imply hierarchy. This elite emerged against a backdrop of rapid maritime colonization that displaced a unique Mesolithic isolate population, although we also detected rare Irish hunter-gatherer introgression within the Neolithic population.
Suggested Citation
Lara M. Cassidy & Ros Ó Maoldúin & Thomas Kador & Ann Lynch & Carleton Jones & Peter C. Woodman & Eileen Murphy & Greer Ramsey & Marion Dowd & Alice Noonan & Ciarán Campbell & Eppie R. Jones & Valeria, 2020.
"A dynastic elite in monumental Neolithic society,"
Nature, Nature, vol. 582(7812), pages 384-388, June.
Handle:
RePEc:nat:nature:v:582:y:2020:i:7812:d:10.1038_s41586-020-2378-6
DOI: 10.1038/s41586-020-2378-6
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.
Citations
Citations are extracted by the
CitEc Project, subscribe to its
RSS feed for this item.
Cited by:
- Adam Benjamin Rohrlach & Maïté Rivollat & Patxuka de-Miguel-Ibáñez & Ulla Moilanen & Anne-Mari Liira & João C. Teixeira & Xavier Roca-Rada & Javier Armendáriz-Martija & Kamen Boyadzhiev & Yavor Boyadz, 2024.
"Cases of trisomy 21 and trisomy 18 among historic and prehistoric individuals discovered from ancient DNA,"
Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 15(1), pages 1-8, December.
- Maciej Chyleński & Przemysław Makarowicz & Anna Juras & Maja Krzewińska & Łukasz Pospieszny & Edvard Ehler & Agnieszka Breszka & Jacek Górski & Halina Taras & Anita Szczepanek & Marta Polańska & Piotr, 2023.
"Patrilocality and hunter-gatherer-related ancestry of populations in East-Central Europe during the Middle Bronze Age,"
Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-12, December.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nat:nature:v:582:y:2020:i:7812:d:10.1038_s41586-020-2378-6. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.nature.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.