IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/nat/nature/v582y2020i7810d10.1038_s41586-020-2225-9.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The nature of Neanderthal introgression revealed by 27,566 Icelandic genomes

Author

Listed:
  • Laurits Skov

    (Aarhus University
    Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology)

  • Moisès Coll Macià

    (Aarhus University)

  • Garðar Sveinbjörnsson

    (deCODE Genetics, Amgen)

  • Fabrizio Mafessoni

    (Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology)

  • Elise A. Lucotte

    (Aarhus University)

  • Margret S. Einarsdóttir

    (deCODE Genetics, Amgen)

  • Hakon Jonsson

    (deCODE Genetics, Amgen)

  • Bjarni Halldorsson

    (deCODE Genetics, Amgen
    Reykjavik University)

  • Daniel F. Gudbjartsson

    (deCODE Genetics, Amgen)

  • Agnar Helgason

    (deCODE Genetics, Amgen
    University of Iceland)

  • Mikkel Heide Schierup

    (Aarhus University)

  • Kari Stefansson

    (deCODE Genetics, Amgen
    University of Iceland)

Abstract

Human evolutionary history is rich with the interbreeding of divergent populations. Most humans outside of Africa trace about 2% of their genomes to admixture from Neanderthals, which occurred 50–60 thousand years ago1. Here we examine the effect of this event using 14.4 million putative archaic chromosome fragments that were detected in fully phased whole-genome sequences from 27,566 Icelanders, corresponding to a range of 56,388–112,709 unique archaic fragments that cover 38.0–48.2% of the callable genome. On the basis of the similarity with known archaic genomes, we assign 84.5% of fragments to an Altai or Vindija Neanderthal origin and 3.3% to Denisovan origin; 12.2% of fragments are of unknown origin. We find that Icelanders have more Denisovan-like fragments than expected through incomplete lineage sorting. This is best explained by Denisovan gene flow, either into ancestors of the introgressing Neanderthals or directly into humans. A within-individual, paired comparison of archaic fragments with syntenic non-archaic fragments revealed that, although the overall rate of mutation was similar in humans and Neanderthals during the 500 thousand years that their lineages were separate, there were differences in the relative frequencies of mutation types—perhaps due to different generation intervals for males and females. Finally, we assessed 271 phenotypes, report 5 associations driven by variants in archaic fragments and show that the majority of previously reported associations are better explained by non-archaic variants.

Suggested Citation

  • Laurits Skov & Moisès Coll Macià & Garðar Sveinbjörnsson & Fabrizio Mafessoni & Elise A. Lucotte & Margret S. Einarsdóttir & Hakon Jonsson & Bjarni Halldorsson & Daniel F. Gudbjartsson & Agnar Helgaso, 2020. "The nature of Neanderthal introgression revealed by 27,566 Icelandic genomes," Nature, Nature, vol. 582(7810), pages 78-83, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:nat:nature:v:582:y:2020:i:7810:d:10.1038_s41586-020-2225-9
    DOI: 10.1038/s41586-020-2225-9
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-020-2225-9
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1038/s41586-020-2225-9?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Kenichi Yamamoto & Shinichi Namba & Kyuto Sonehara & Ken Suzuki & Saori Sakaue & Niall P. Cooke & Shinichi Higashiue & Shuzo Kobayashi & Hisaaki Afuso & Kosho Matsuura & Yojiro Mitsumoto & Yasuhiko Fu, 2024. "Genetic legacy of ancient hunter-gatherer Jomon in Japanese populations," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 15(1), pages 1-15, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nat:nature:v:582:y:2020:i:7810:d:10.1038_s41586-020-2225-9. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.nature.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.