Author
Listed:
- Anat Arzi
(University of Cambridge
Weizmann Institute of Science
Weizmann Institute of Science)
- Liron Rozenkrantz
(Weizmann Institute of Science
Weizmann Institute of Science)
- Lior Gorodisky
(Weizmann Institute of Science
Weizmann Institute of Science)
- Danit Rozenkrantz
(Loewenstein Hospital Rehabilitation Center)
- Yael Holtzman
(Weizmann Institute of Science
Weizmann Institute of Science)
- Aharon Ravia
(Weizmann Institute of Science
Weizmann Institute of Science)
- Tristan A. Bekinschtein
(University of Cambridge)
- Tatyana Galperin
(Loewenstein Hospital Rehabilitation Center)
- Ben-Zion Krimchansky
(Loewenstein Hospital Rehabilitation Center)
- Gal Cohen
(Loewenstein Hospital Rehabilitation Center)
- Anna Oksamitni
(Loewenstein Hospital Rehabilitation Center)
- Elena Aidinoff
(Loewenstein Hospital Rehabilitation Center)
- Yaron Sacher
(Loewenstein Hospital Rehabilitation Center
Tel-Aviv University)
- Noam Sobel
(Weizmann Institute of Science
Weizmann Institute of Science)
Abstract
After severe brain injury, it can be difficult to determine the state of consciousness of a patient, to determine whether the patient is unresponsive or perhaps minimally conscious1, and to predict whether they will recover. These diagnoses and prognoses are crucial, as they determine therapeutic strategies such as pain management, and can underlie end-of-life decisions2,3. Nevertheless, there is an error rate of up to 40% in determining the state of consciousness in patients with brain injuries4,5. Olfaction relies on brain structures that are involved in the basic mechanisms of arousal6, and we therefore hypothesized that it may serve as a biomarker for consciousness7. Here we use a non-verbal non-task-dependent measure known as the sniff response8–11 to determine consciousness in patients with brain injuries. By measuring odorant-dependent sniffing, we gain a sensitive measure of olfactory function10–15. We measured the sniff response repeatedly over time in patients with severe brain injuries and found that sniff responses significantly discriminated between unresponsive and minimally conscious states at the group level. Notably, at the single-patient level, if an unresponsive patient had a sniff response, this assured future regaining of consciousness. In addition, olfactory sniff responses were associated with long-term survival rates. These results highlight the importance of olfaction in human brain function, and provide an accessible tool that signals consciousness and recovery in patients with brain injuries.
Suggested Citation
Anat Arzi & Liron Rozenkrantz & Lior Gorodisky & Danit Rozenkrantz & Yael Holtzman & Aharon Ravia & Tristan A. Bekinschtein & Tatyana Galperin & Ben-Zion Krimchansky & Gal Cohen & Anna Oksamitni & Ele, 2020.
"Olfactory sniffing signals consciousness in unresponsive patients with brain injuries,"
Nature, Nature, vol. 581(7809), pages 428-433, May.
Handle:
RePEc:nat:nature:v:581:y:2020:i:7809:d:10.1038_s41586-020-2245-5
DOI: 10.1038/s41586-020-2245-5
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nat:nature:v:581:y:2020:i:7809:d:10.1038_s41586-020-2245-5. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.nature.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.