IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/nat/nature/v580y2020i7803d10.1038_s41586-020-2165-4.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Dating the skull from Broken Hill, Zambia, and its position in human evolution

Author

Listed:
  • Rainer Grün

    (Griffith University
    The Australian National University)

  • Alistair Pike

    (University of Southampton)

  • Frank McDermott

    (University College Dublin,)

  • Stephen Eggins

    (The Australian National University)

  • Graham Mortimer

    (The Australian National University)

  • Maxime Aubert

    (The Australian National University
    Griffith University)

  • Lesley Kinsley

    (The Australian National University)

  • Renaud Joannes-Boyau

    (The Australian National University
    Southern Cross University)

  • Michael Rumsey

    (Natural History Museum)

  • Christiane Denys

    (Sorbonne Université, EPHE, Université des Antilles)

  • James Brink

    (National Museum
    University of the Free State)

  • Tara Clark

    (Griffith University
    University of Queensland
    University of Wollongong)

  • Chris Stringer

    (Natural History Museum)

Abstract

The cranium from Broken Hill (Kabwe) was recovered from cave deposits in 1921, during metal ore mining in what is now Zambia1. It is one of the best-preserved skulls of a fossil hominin, and was initially designated as the type specimen of Homo rhodesiensis, but recently it has often been included in the taxon Homo heidelbergensis2–4. However, the original site has since been completely quarried away, and—although the cranium is often estimated to be around 500 thousand years old5–7—its unsystematic recovery impedes its accurate dating and placement in human evolution. Here we carried out analyses directly on the skull and found a best age estimate of 299 ± 25 thousand years (mean ± 2σ). The result suggests that later Middle Pleistocene Africa contained multiple contemporaneous hominin lineages (that is, Homo sapiens8,9, H. heidelbergensis/H. rhodesiensis and Homo naledi10,11), similar to Eurasia, where Homo neanderthalensis, the Denisovans, Homo floresiensis, Homo luzonensis and perhaps also Homo heidelbergensis and Homo erectus12 were found contemporaneously. The age estimate also raises further questions about the mode of evolution of H. sapiens in Africa and whether H. heidelbergensis/H. rhodesiensis was a direct ancestor of our species13,14.

Suggested Citation

  • Rainer Grün & Alistair Pike & Frank McDermott & Stephen Eggins & Graham Mortimer & Maxime Aubert & Lesley Kinsley & Renaud Joannes-Boyau & Michael Rumsey & Christiane Denys & James Brink & Tara Clark , 2020. "Dating the skull from Broken Hill, Zambia, and its position in human evolution," Nature, Nature, vol. 580(7803), pages 372-375, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:nat:nature:v:580:y:2020:i:7803:d:10.1038_s41586-020-2165-4
    DOI: 10.1038/s41586-020-2165-4
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-020-2165-4
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1038/s41586-020-2165-4?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nat:nature:v:580:y:2020:i:7803:d:10.1038_s41586-020-2165-4. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.nature.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.