IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/nat/nature/v580y2020i7802d10.1038_s41586-020-2138-7.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Global conservation of species’ niches

Author

Listed:
  • Jeffrey O. Hanson

    (The University of Queensland)

  • Jonathan R. Rhodes

    (The University of Queensland)

  • Stuart H. M. Butchart

    (BirdLife International
    University of Cambridge)

  • Graeme M. Buchanan

    (RSPB Centre for Conservation Science, RSPB)

  • Carlo Rondinini

    (Sapienza Università di Roma)

  • Gentile F. Ficetola

    (University of Milan
    Universitè Grenoble Alpes)

  • Richard A. Fuller

    (The University of Queensland)

Abstract

Environmental change is rapidly accelerating, and many species will need to adapt to survive1. Ensuring that protected areas cover populations across a broad range of environmental conditions could safeguard the processes that lead to such adaptations1–3. However, international conservation policies have largely neglected these considerations when setting targets for the expansion of protected areas4. Here we show that—of 19,937 vertebrate species globally5–8—the representation of environmental conditions across their habitats in protected areas (hereafter, niche representation) is inadequate for 4,836 (93.1%) amphibian, 8,653 (89.5%) bird and 4,608 (90.9%) terrestrial mammal species. Expanding existing protected areas to cover these gaps would encompass 33.8% of the total land surface—exceeding the current target of 17% that has been adopted by governments. Priority locations for expanding the system of protected areas to improve niche representation occur in global biodiversity hotspots9, including Colombia, Papua New Guinea, South Africa and southwest China, as well as across most of the major land masses of the Earth. Conversely, we also show that planning for the expansion of protected areas without explicitly considering environmental conditions would marginally reduce the land area required to 30.7%, but that this would lead to inadequate niche representation for 7,798 (39.1%) species. As the governments of the world prepare to renegotiate global conservation targets, policymakers have the opportunity to help to maintain the adaptive potential of species by considering niche representation within protected areas1,2.

Suggested Citation

  • Jeffrey O. Hanson & Jonathan R. Rhodes & Stuart H. M. Butchart & Graeme M. Buchanan & Carlo Rondinini & Gentile F. Ficetola & Richard A. Fuller, 2020. "Global conservation of species’ niches," Nature, Nature, vol. 580(7802), pages 232-234, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:nat:nature:v:580:y:2020:i:7802:d:10.1038_s41586-020-2138-7
    DOI: 10.1038/s41586-020-2138-7
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-020-2138-7
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1038/s41586-020-2138-7?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Rachel A. Neugarten & Rebecca Chaplin-Kramer & Richard P. Sharp & Richard Schuster & Matthew Strimas-Mackey & Patrick R. Roehrdanz & Mark Mulligan & Arnout Soesbergen & David Hole & Christina M. Kenne, 2024. "Mapping the planet’s critical areas for biodiversity and nature’s contributions to people," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 15(1), pages 1-11, December.
    2. Alvise Dabalà & Farid Dahdouh-Guebas & Daniel C. Dunn & Jason D. Everett & Catherine E. Lovelock & Jeffrey O. Hanson & Kristine Camille V. Buenafe & Sandra Neubert & Anthony J. Richardson, 2023. "Priority areas to protect mangroves and maximise ecosystem services," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-14, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nat:nature:v:580:y:2020:i:7802:d:10.1038_s41586-020-2138-7. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.nature.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.