Author
Listed:
- Oleg I. Rumyantsev
(Stanford University
Stanford University
Stanford University)
- Jérôme A. Lecoq
(Stanford University
Stanford University
Stanford University
Allen Institute for Brain Science)
- Oscar Hernandez
(Stanford University
Stanford University)
- Yanping Zhang
(Stanford University
Stanford University
Stanford University)
- Joan Savall
(Stanford University
Stanford University
Stanford University)
- Radosław Chrapkiewicz
(Stanford University
Stanford University)
- Jane Li
(Stanford University
Stanford University)
- Hongkui Zeng
(Allen Institute for Brain Science)
- Surya Ganguli
(Stanford University
Stanford University)
- Mark J. Schnitzer
(Stanford University
Stanford University
Stanford University
Stanford University)
Abstract
How the brain processes information accurately despite stochastic neural activity is a longstanding question1. For instance, perception is fundamentally limited by the information that the brain can extract from the noisy dynamics of sensory neurons. Seminal experiments2,3 suggest that correlated noise in sensory cortical neural ensembles is what limits their coding accuracy4–6, although how correlated noise affects neural codes remains debated7–11. Recent theoretical work proposes that how a neural ensemble’s sensory tuning properties relate statistically to its correlated noise patterns is a greater determinant of coding accuracy than is absolute noise strength12–14. However, without simultaneous recordings from thousands of cortical neurons with shared sensory inputs, it is unknown whether correlated noise limits coding fidelity. Here we present a 16-beam, two-photon microscope to monitor activity across the mouse primary visual cortex, along with analyses to quantify the information conveyed by large neural ensembles. We found that, in the visual cortex, correlated noise constrained signalling for ensembles with 800–1,300 neurons. Several noise components of the ensemble dynamics grew proportionally to the ensemble size and the encoded visual signals, revealing the predicted information-limiting correlations12–14. Notably, visual signals were perpendicular to the largest noise mode, which therefore did not limit coding fidelity. The information-limiting noise modes were approximately ten times smaller and concordant with mouse visual acuity15. Therefore, cortical design principles appear to enhance coding accuracy by restricting around 90% of noise fluctuations to modes that do not limit signalling fidelity, whereas much weaker correlated noise modes inherently bound sensory discrimination.
Suggested Citation
Oleg I. Rumyantsev & Jérôme A. Lecoq & Oscar Hernandez & Yanping Zhang & Joan Savall & Radosław Chrapkiewicz & Jane Li & Hongkui Zeng & Surya Ganguli & Mark J. Schnitzer, 2020.
"Fundamental bounds on the fidelity of sensory cortical coding,"
Nature, Nature, vol. 580(7801), pages 100-105, April.
Handle:
RePEc:nat:nature:v:580:y:2020:i:7801:d:10.1038_s41586-020-2130-2
DOI: 10.1038/s41586-020-2130-2
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nat:nature:v:580:y:2020:i:7801:d:10.1038_s41586-020-2130-2. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.nature.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.