Author
Listed:
- Ronald J. Vagnozzi
(University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati Children’s Hospital Medical Center)
- Marjorie Maillet
(University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati Children’s Hospital Medical Center)
- Michelle A. Sargent
(University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati Children’s Hospital Medical Center)
- Hadi Khalil
(University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati Children’s Hospital Medical Center)
- Anne Katrine Z. Johansen
(University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati Children’s Hospital Medical Center)
- Jennifer A. Schwanekamp
(University of Cincinnati)
- Allen J. York
(University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati Children’s Hospital Medical Center)
- Vincent Huang
(University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati Children’s Hospital Medical Center)
- Matthias Nahrendorf
(Massachusetts General Hospital of the Harvard Medical School)
- Sakthivel Sadayappan
(University of Cincinnati)
- Jeffery D. Molkentin
(University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati Children’s Hospital Medical Center
Cincinnati Children’s Hospital Medical Center)
Abstract
Clinical trials using adult stem cells to regenerate damaged heart tissue continue to this day1,2, despite ongoing questions of efficacy and a lack of mechanistic understanding of the underlying biological effect3. The rationale for these cell therapy trials is derived from animal studies that show a modest but reproducible improvement in cardiac function in models of cardiac ischaemic injury4,5. Here we examine the mechanistic basis for cell therapy in mice after ischaemia–reperfusion injury, and find that—although heart function is enhanced—it is not associated with the production of new cardiomyocytes. Cell therapy improved heart function through an acute sterile immune response characterized by the temporal and regional induction of CCR2+ and CX3CR1+ macrophages. Intracardiac injection of two distinct types of adult stem cells, cells killed by freezing and thawing or a chemical inducer of the innate immune response all induced a similar regional accumulation of CCR2+ and CX3CR1+ macrophages, and provided functional rejuvenation to the heart after ischaemia–reperfusion injury. This selective macrophage response altered the activity of cardiac fibroblasts, reduced the extracellular matrix content in the border zone and enhanced the mechanical properties of the injured area. The functional benefit of cardiac cell therapy is thus due to an acute inflammatory-based wound-healing response that rejuvenates the infarcted area of the heart.
Suggested Citation
Ronald J. Vagnozzi & Marjorie Maillet & Michelle A. Sargent & Hadi Khalil & Anne Katrine Z. Johansen & Jennifer A. Schwanekamp & Allen J. York & Vincent Huang & Matthias Nahrendorf & Sakthivel Sadayap, 2020.
"An acute immune response underlies the benefit of cardiac stem cell therapy,"
Nature, Nature, vol. 577(7790), pages 405-409, January.
Handle:
RePEc:nat:nature:v:577:y:2020:i:7790:d:10.1038_s41586-019-1802-2
DOI: 10.1038/s41586-019-1802-2
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.
Citations
Citations are extracted by the
CitEc Project, subscribe to its
RSS feed for this item.
Cited by:
- Rongmao Qiu & Xiaojing Li & Kui Huang & Weizhe Bai & Daoning Zhou & Gang Li & Zhao Qin & Yang Li, 2023.
"Cis-trans isomerization of peptoid residues in the collagen triple-helix,"
Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-12, December.
- Swee Heng Milon Pang & Joshua D’Rozario & Senora Mendonca & Tejasvini Bhuvan & Natalie L. Payne & Di Zheng & Assifa Hisana & Georgia Wallis & Adele Barugahare & David Powell & Jai Rautela & Nicholas D, 2021.
"Mesenchymal stromal cell apoptosis is required for their therapeutic function,"
Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 12(1), pages 1-19, December.
- Argen Mamazhakypov & Natascha Sommer & Birgit Assmus & Khodr Tello & Ralph Theo Schermuly & Djuro Kosanovic & Akpay Sh. Sarybaev & Norbert Weissmann & Oleg Pak, 2021.
"Novel Therapeutic Targets for the Treatment of Right Ventricular Remodeling: Insights from the Pulmonary Artery Banding Model,"
IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(16), pages 1-21, August.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nat:nature:v:577:y:2020:i:7790:d:10.1038_s41586-019-1802-2. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.nature.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.