IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/nat/nature/v573y2019i7772d10.1038_s41586-019-1473-z.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Fossil insect eyes shed light on trilobite optics and the arthropod pigment screen

Author

Listed:
  • Johan Lindgren

    (Lund University)

  • Dan-Eric Nilsson

    (Lund University)

  • Peter Sjövall

    (RISE Research Institutes of Sweden)

  • Martin Jarenmark

    (Lund University)

  • Shosuke Ito

    (Fujita Health University School of Health Sciences)

  • Kazumasa Wakamatsu

    (Fujita Health University School of Health Sciences)

  • Benjamin P. Kear

    (Uppsala University)

  • Bo Pagh Schultz

    (Fur Museum)

  • René Lyng Sylvestersen

    (Fur Museum)

  • Henrik Madsen

    (Mo-clay Museum)

  • James R. LaFountain

    (University at Buffalo)

  • Carl Alwmark

    (Lund University)

  • Mats E. Eriksson

    (Lund University)

  • Stephen A. Hall

    (Lund University)

  • Paula Lindgren

    (Lund University)

  • Irene Rodríguez-Meizoso

    (Lund University)

  • Per Ahlberg

    (Lund University)

Abstract

Fossilized eyes permit inferences of the visual capacity of extinct arthropods1–3. However, structural and/or chemical modifications as a result of taphonomic and diagenetic processes can alter the original features, thereby necessitating comparisons with modern species. Here we report the detailed molecular composition and microanatomy of the eyes of 54-million-year-old crane-flies, which together provide a proxy for the interpretation of optical systems in some other ancient arthropods. These well-preserved visual organs comprise calcified corneal lenses that are separated by intervening spaces containing eumelanin pigment. We also show that eumelanin is present in the facet walls of living crane-flies, in which it forms the outermost ommatidial pigment shield in compound eyes incorporating a chitinous cornea. To our knowledge, this is the first record of melanic screening pigments in arthropods, and reveals a fossilization mode in insect eyes that involves a decay-resistant biochrome coupled with early diagenetic mineralization of the ommatidial lenses. The demonstrable secondary calcification of lens cuticle that was initially chitinous has implications for the proposed calcitic corneas of trilobites, which we posit are artefacts of preservation rather than a product of in vivo biomineralization4–7. Although trilobite eyes might have been partly mineralized for mechanical strength, a (more likely) organic composition would have enhanced function via gradient-index optics and increased control of lens shape.

Suggested Citation

  • Johan Lindgren & Dan-Eric Nilsson & Peter Sjövall & Martin Jarenmark & Shosuke Ito & Kazumasa Wakamatsu & Benjamin P. Kear & Bo Pagh Schultz & René Lyng Sylvestersen & Henrik Madsen & James R. LaFount, 2019. "Fossil insect eyes shed light on trilobite optics and the arthropod pigment screen," Nature, Nature, vol. 573(7772), pages 122-125, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:nat:nature:v:573:y:2019:i:7772:d:10.1038_s41586-019-1473-z
    DOI: 10.1038/s41586-019-1473-z
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-019-1473-z
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1038/s41586-019-1473-z?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Tiffany S. Slater & Shosuke Ito & Kazumasa Wakamatsu & Fucheng Zhang & Peter Sjövall & Martin Jarenmark & Johan Lindgren & Maria E. McNamara, 2023. "Taphonomic experiments reveal authentic molecular signals for fossil melanins and verify preservation of phaeomelanin in fossils," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-15, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nat:nature:v:573:y:2019:i:7772:d:10.1038_s41586-019-1473-z. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.nature.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.