Author
Listed:
- Ryan M. R. Gawryluk
(University of British Columbia
University of Victoria)
- Denis V. Tikhonenkov
(University of British Columbia
Russian Academy of Sciences)
- Elisabeth Hehenberger
(University of British Columbia
Division of Experimental Ecology)
- Filip Husnik
(University of British Columbia)
- Alexander P. Mylnikov
(Russian Academy of Sciences)
- Patrick J. Keeling
(University of British Columbia)
Abstract
Rhodophyta (red algae) is one of three lineages of Archaeplastida1, a supergroup that is united by the primary endosymbiotic origin of plastids in eukaryotes2,3. Red algae are a diverse and species-rich group, members of which are typically photoautotrophic, but are united by a number of highly derived characteristics: they have relatively small intron-poor genomes, reduced metabolism and lack cytoskeletal structures that are associated with motility, flagella and centrioles. This suggests that marked gene loss occurred around their origin4; however, this is difficult to reconstruct because they differ so much from the other archaeplastid lineages, and the relationships between these lineages are unclear. Here we describe the novel eukaryotic phylum Rhodelphidia and, using phylogenomics, demonstrate that it is a closely related sister to red algae. However, the characteristics of the two Rhodelphis species described here are nearly opposite to those that define red algae: they are non-photosynthetic, flagellate predators with gene-rich genomes, along with a relic genome-lacking primary plastid that probably participates in haem synthesis. Overall, these findings alter our views of the origins of Rhodophyta, and Archaeplastida evolution as a whole, as they indicate that mixotrophic feeding—that is, a combination of predation and phototrophy—persisted well into the evolution of the group.
Suggested Citation
Ryan M. R. Gawryluk & Denis V. Tikhonenkov & Elisabeth Hehenberger & Filip Husnik & Alexander P. Mylnikov & Patrick J. Keeling, 2019.
"Non-photosynthetic predators are sister to red algae,"
Nature, Nature, vol. 572(7768), pages 240-243, August.
Handle:
RePEc:nat:nature:v:572:y:2019:i:7768:d:10.1038_s41586-019-1398-6
DOI: 10.1038/s41586-019-1398-6
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nat:nature:v:572:y:2019:i:7768:d:10.1038_s41586-019-1398-6. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.nature.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.