IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/nat/nature/v571y2019i7764d10.1038_s41586-019-1345-6.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Foot callus thickness does not trade off protection for tactile sensitivity during walking

Author

Listed:
  • Nicholas B. Holowka

    (Harvard University)

  • Bert Wynands

    (Technische Universität Chemnitz)

  • Tina J. Drechsel

    (Technische Universität Chemnitz)

  • Andrew K. Yegian

    (Harvard University)

  • Victoria A. Tobolsky

    (Harvard University)

  • Paul Okutoyi

    (Moi University Medical School)

  • Robert Mang’eni Ojiambo

    (Moi University Medical School
    University of Global Health Equity)

  • Diresibachew W. Haile

    (Moi University Medical School
    Addis Ababa University)

  • Timothy K. Sigei

    (Moi University)

  • Claudio Zippenfennig

    (Technische Universität Chemnitz)

  • Thomas L. Milani

    (Technische Universität Chemnitz)

  • Daniel E. Lieberman

    (Harvard University)

Abstract

Until relatively recently, humans, similar to other animals, were habitually barefoot. Therefore, the soles of our feet were the only direct contact between the body and the ground when walking. There is indirect evidence that footwear such as sandals and moccasins were first invented within the past 40 thousand years1, the oldest recovered footwear dates to eight thousand years ago2 and inexpensive shoes with cushioned heels were not developed until the Industrial Revolution3. Because calluses—thickened and hardened areas of the epidermal layer of the skin—are the evolutionary solution to protecting the foot, we wondered whether they differ from shoes in maintaining tactile sensitivity during walking, especially at initial foot contact, to improve safety on surfaces that can be slippery, abrasive or otherwise injurious or uncomfortable. Here we show that, as expected, people from Kenya and the United States who frequently walk barefoot have thicker and harder calluses than those who typically use footwear. However, in contrast to shoes, callus thickness does not trade-off protection, measured as hardness and stiffness, for the ability to perceive tactile stimuli at frequencies experienced during walking. Additionally, unlike cushioned footwear, callus thickness does not affect how hard the feet strike the ground during walking, as indicated by impact forces. Along with providing protection and comfort at the cost of tactile sensitivity, cushioned footwear also lowers rates of loading at impact but increases force impulses, with unknown effects on the skeleton that merit future study.

Suggested Citation

  • Nicholas B. Holowka & Bert Wynands & Tina J. Drechsel & Andrew K. Yegian & Victoria A. Tobolsky & Paul Okutoyi & Robert Mang’eni Ojiambo & Diresibachew W. Haile & Timothy K. Sigei & Claudio Zippenfenn, 2019. "Foot callus thickness does not trade off protection for tactile sensitivity during walking," Nature, Nature, vol. 571(7764), pages 261-264, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:nat:nature:v:571:y:2019:i:7764:d:10.1038_s41586-019-1345-6
    DOI: 10.1038/s41586-019-1345-6
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-019-1345-6
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1038/s41586-019-1345-6?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Stephen MacGabhann & Declan Kearney & Nic Perrem & Peter Francis, 2022. "Barefoot Running on Grass as a Potential Treatment for Plantar Fasciitis: A Prospective Case Series," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(23), pages 1-10, November.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nat:nature:v:571:y:2019:i:7764:d:10.1038_s41586-019-1345-6. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.nature.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.