IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/nat/nature/v571y2019i7763d10.1038_s41586-019-1332-y.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Neogene cooling driven by land surface reactivity rather than increased weathering fluxes

Author

Listed:
  • Jeremy K. Caves Rugenstein

    (ETH Zürich
    Max Planck Institute for Meteorology
    Senckenberg Biodiversity and Climate Research Centre)

  • Daniel E. Ibarra

    (Stanford University)

  • Friedhelm von Blanckenburg

    (Earth Surface Geochemistry
    Freie Universität Berlin)

Abstract

The long-term cooling, decline in the partial pressure of carbon dioxide, and the establishment of permanent polar ice sheets during the Neogene period1,2 have frequently been attributed to increased uplift and erosion of mountains and consequent increases in silicate weathering, which removes atmospheric carbon dioxide3,4. However, geological records of erosion rates are potentially subject to averaging biases5,6, and the magnitude of the increase in weathering fluxes—and even its existence—remain debated7–9. Moreover, an increase in weathering scaled to the proposed erosional increase would have removed nearly all carbon from the atmosphere10, which has led to suggestions of compensatory carbon fluxes11–13 in order to preserve mass balance in the carbon cycle. Alternatively, an increase in land surface reactivity—resulting from greater fresh-mineral surface area or an increase in the supply of reactive minerals—rather than an increase in the weathering flux, has been proposed to reconcile these disparate views8,9. Here we use a parsimonious carbon cycle model that tracks two weathering-sensitive isotopic tracers (stable 7Li/6Li and cosmogenic 10Be/9Be) to show that an increase in land surface reactivity is necessary to simultaneously decrease atmospheric carbon dioxide, increase seawater 7Li/6Li and retain constant seawater 10Be/9Be over the past 16 million years. We find that the global silicate weathering flux remained constant, even as the global silicate weathering intensity—the fraction of the total denudation flux that is derived from silicate weathering—decreased, sustained by an increase in erosion. Long-term cooling during the Neogene thus reflects a change in the partitioning of denudation into weathering and erosion. Variable partitioning of denudation and consequent changes in silicate weathering intensity reconcile marine isotope and erosion records with the need to maintain mass balance in the carbon cycle and without requiring increases in the silicate weathering flux.

Suggested Citation

  • Jeremy K. Caves Rugenstein & Daniel E. Ibarra & Friedhelm von Blanckenburg, 2019. "Neogene cooling driven by land surface reactivity rather than increased weathering fluxes," Nature, Nature, vol. 571(7763), pages 99-102, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:nat:nature:v:571:y:2019:i:7763:d:10.1038_s41586-019-1332-y
    DOI: 10.1038/s41586-019-1332-y
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-019-1332-y
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1038/s41586-019-1332-y?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Kai Deng & Shouye Yang & Yulong Guo, 2022. "A global temperature control of silicate weathering intensity," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-10, December.
    2. Fei Zhang & Mathieu Dellinger & Robert G. Hilton & Jimin Yu & Mark B. Allen & Alexander L. Densmore & Hui Sun & Zhangdong Jin, 2022. "Hydrological control of river and seawater lithium isotopes," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-10, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nat:nature:v:571:y:2019:i:7763:d:10.1038_s41586-019-1332-y. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.nature.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.