Author
Listed:
- J. M. Diederik Kruijssen
(Zentrum für Astronomie der Universität Heidelberg
Max-Planck Institut für Astronomie)
- Andreas Schruba
(Max-Planck Institut für Extraterrestrische Physik)
- Mélanie Chevance
(Zentrum für Astronomie der Universität Heidelberg)
- Steven N. Longmore
(Liverpool John Moores University)
- Alexander P. S. Hygate
(Zentrum für Astronomie der Universität Heidelberg
Max-Planck Institut für Astronomie)
- Daniel T. Haydon
(Zentrum für Astronomie der Universität Heidelberg)
- Anna F. McLeod
(University of California Berkeley
Texas Tech University)
- Julianne J. Dalcanton
(University of Washington)
- Linda J. Tacconi
(Max-Planck Institut für Extraterrestrische Physik)
- Ewine F. Dishoeck
(Max-Planck Institut für Extraterrestrische Physik
Leiden University)
Abstract
The physics of star formation and the deposition of mass, momentum and energy into the interstellar medium by massive stars (‘feedback’) are the main uncertainties in modern cosmological simulations of galaxy formation and evolution1,2. These processes determine the properties of galaxies3,4 but are poorly understood on the scale of individual giant molecular clouds (less than 100 parsecs)5,6, which are resolved in modern galaxy formation simulations7,8. The key question is why the timescale for depleting molecular gas through star formation in galaxies (about 2 billion years)9,10 exceeds the cloud dynamical timescale by two orders of magnitude11. Either most of a cloud’s mass is converted into stars over many dynamical times12 or only a small fraction turns into stars before the cloud is dispersed on a dynamical timescale13,14. Here we report high-angular-resolution observations of the nearby flocculent spiral galaxy NGC 300. We find that the molecular gas and high-mass star formation on the scale of giant molecular clouds are spatially decorrelated, in contrast to their tight correlation on galactic scales5. We demonstrate that this decorrelation implies rapid evolutionary cycling between clouds, star formation and feedback. We apply a statistical method15,16 to quantify the evolutionary timeline and find that star formation is regulated by efficient stellar feedback, which drives cloud dispersal on short timescales (around 1.5 million years). The rapid feedback arises from radiation and stellar winds, before supernova explosions can occur. This feedback limits cloud lifetimes to about one dynamical timescale (about 10 million years), with integrated star formation efficiencies of only 2 to 3 per cent. Our findings reveal that galaxies consist of building blocks undergoing vigorous, feedback-driven life cycles that vary with the galactic environment and collectively define how galaxies form stars.
Suggested Citation
J. M. Diederik Kruijssen & Andreas Schruba & Mélanie Chevance & Steven N. Longmore & Alexander P. S. Hygate & Daniel T. Haydon & Anna F. McLeod & Julianne J. Dalcanton & Linda J. Tacconi & Ewine F. Di, 2019.
"Fast and inefficient star formation due to short-lived molecular clouds and rapid feedback,"
Nature, Nature, vol. 569(7757), pages 519-522, May.
Handle:
RePEc:nat:nature:v:569:y:2019:i:7757:d:10.1038_s41586-019-1194-3
DOI: 10.1038/s41586-019-1194-3
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nat:nature:v:569:y:2019:i:7757:d:10.1038_s41586-019-1194-3. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.nature.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.