Author
Listed:
- Eli L. Diamond
(Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
Weill Cornell Medical College)
- Benjamin H. Durham
(Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center)
- Gary A. Ulaner
(Weill Cornell Medical College
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center)
- Esther Drill
(Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center)
- Justin Buthorn
(Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center)
- Michelle Ki
(Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center)
- Lillian Bitner
(Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center)
- Hana Cho
(Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center)
- Robert J. Young
(Weill Cornell Medical College
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center)
- Jasmine H. Francis
(Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center)
- Raajit Rampal
(Weill Cornell Medical College
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center)
- Mario Lacouture
(Weill Cornell Medical College
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center)
- Lynn A. Brody
(Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center)
- Neval Ozkaya
(Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
National Cancer Institute)
- Ahmet Dogan
(Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center)
- Neal Rosen
(Weill Cornell Medical College
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center)
- Alexia Iasonos
(Weill Cornell Medical College
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center)
- Omar Abdel-Wahab
(Weill Cornell Medical College
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center)
- David M. Hyman
(Weill Cornell Medical College
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center)
Abstract
Histiocytic neoplasms are a heterogeneous group of clonal haematopoietic disorders that are marked by diverse mutations in the mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) pathway1,2. For the 50% of patients with histiocytosis who have BRAFV600 mutations3–5, RAF inhibition is highly efficacious and has markedly altered the natural history of the disease6,7. However, no standard therapy exists for the remaining 50% of patients who lack BRAFV600 mutations. Although ERK dependence has been hypothesized to be a consistent feature across histiocytic neoplasms, this remains clinically unproven and many of the kinase mutations that are found in patients who lack BRAFV600 mutations have not previously been biologically characterized. Here we show ERK dependency in histiocytoses through a proof-of-concept clinical trial of cobimetinib, an oral inhibitor of MEK1 and MEK2, in patients with histiocytoses. Patients were enrolled regardless of their tumour genotype. In parallel, MAPK alterations that were identified in treated patients were characterized for their ability to activate ERK. In the 18 patients that we treated, the overall response rate was 89% (90% confidence interval of 73–100). Responses were durable, with no acquired resistance to date. At one year, 100% of responses were ongoing and 94% of patients remained progression-free. Cobimetinib treatment was efficacious regardless of genotype, and responses were observed in patients with ARAF, BRAF, RAF1, NRAS, KRAS, MEK1 (also known as MAP2K1) and MEK2 (also known as MAP2K2) mutations. Consistent with the observed responses, the characterization of the mutations that we identified in these patients confirmed that the MAPK-pathway mutations were activating. Collectively, these data demonstrate that histiocytic neoplasms are characterized by a notable dependence on MAPK signalling—and that they are consequently responsive to MEK inhibition. These results extend the benefits of molecularly targeted therapy to the entire spectrum of patients with histiocytosis.
Suggested Citation
Eli L. Diamond & Benjamin H. Durham & Gary A. Ulaner & Esther Drill & Justin Buthorn & Michelle Ki & Lillian Bitner & Hana Cho & Robert J. Young & Jasmine H. Francis & Raajit Rampal & Mario Lacouture , 2019.
"Efficacy of MEK inhibition in patients with histiocytic neoplasms,"
Nature, Nature, vol. 567(7749), pages 521-524, March.
Handle:
RePEc:nat:nature:v:567:y:2019:i:7749:d:10.1038_s41586-019-1012-y
DOI: 10.1038/s41586-019-1012-y
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nat:nature:v:567:y:2019:i:7749:d:10.1038_s41586-019-1012-y. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.nature.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.