Author
Listed:
- ChaoQing Yu
(Tsinghua University
Cross-strait Tsinghua Research Institute)
- Xiao Huang
(Tsinghua University
Norwegian Institute of Bioeconomy Research)
- Han Chen
(Tsinghua University)
- H. Charles J. Godfray
(University of Oxford
University of Oxford)
- Jonathon S. Wright
(Tsinghua University)
- Jim W. Hall
(University of Oxford)
- Peng Gong
(Tsinghua University
Cross-strait Tsinghua Research Institute)
- ShaoQiang Ni
(Tsinghua University)
- ShengChao Qiao
(Tsinghua University)
- GuoRui Huang
(Tsinghua University)
- YuChen Xiao
(Tsinghua University)
- Jie Zhang
(Tsinghua University)
- Zhao Feng
(Tsinghua University)
- XiaoTang Ju
(China Agricultural University)
- Philippe Ciais
(Laboratoire des Sciences du Climat et de l’Environnement (LSCE))
- Nils Chr. Stenseth
(Tsinghua University
University of Oslo)
- Dag O. Hessen
(University of Oslo)
- ZhanLi Sun
(Leibniz Institute of Agricultural Development in Transition Economies (IAMO))
- Le Yu
(Tsinghua University)
- WenJia Cai
(Tsinghua University)
- HaoHuan Fu
(Tsinghua University)
- XiaoMeng Huang
(Tsinghua University)
- Chi Zhang
(Royal Institute of Technology)
- HongBin Liu
(Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences)
- James Taylor
(Newcastle University)
Abstract
The nitrogen cycle has been radically changed by human activities1. China consumes nearly one third of the world’s nitrogen fertilizers. The excessive application of fertilizers2,3 and increased nitrogen discharge from livestock, domestic and industrial sources have resulted in pervasive water pollution. Quantifying a nitrogen ‘boundary’4 in heterogeneous environments is important for the effective management of local water quality. Here we use a combination of water-quality observations and simulated nitrogen discharge from agricultural and other sources to estimate spatial patterns of nitrogen discharge into water bodies across China from 1955 to 2014. We find that the critical surface-water quality standard (1.0 milligrams of nitrogen per litre) was being exceeded in most provinces by the mid-1980s, and that current rates of anthropogenic nitrogen discharge (14.5 ± 3.1 megatonnes of nitrogen per year) to fresh water are about 2.7 times the estimated ‘safe’ nitrogen discharge threshold (5.2 ± 0.7 megatonnes of nitrogen per year). Current efforts to reduce pollution through wastewater treatment and by improving cropland nitrogen management can partially remedy this situation. Domestic wastewater treatment has helped to reduce net discharge by 0.7 ± 0.1 megatonnes in 2014, but at high monetary and energy costs. Improved cropland nitrogen management could remove another 2.3 ± 0.3 megatonnes of nitrogen per year—about 25 per cent of the excess discharge to fresh water. Successfully restoring a clean water environment in China will further require transformational changes to boost the national nutrient recycling rate from its current average of 36 per cent to about 87 per cent, which is a level typical of traditional Chinese agriculture. Although ambitious, such a high level of nitrogen recycling is technologically achievable at an estimated capital cost of approximately 100 billion US dollars and operating costs of 18–29 billion US dollars per year, and could provide co-benefits such as recycled wastewater for crop irrigation and improved environmental quality and ecosystem services.
Suggested Citation
ChaoQing Yu & Xiao Huang & Han Chen & H. Charles J. Godfray & Jonathon S. Wright & Jim W. Hall & Peng Gong & ShaoQiang Ni & ShengChao Qiao & GuoRui Huang & YuChen Xiao & Jie Zhang & Zhao Feng & XiaoTa, 2019.
"Managing nitrogen to restore water quality in China,"
Nature, Nature, vol. 567(7749), pages 516-520, March.
Handle:
RePEc:nat:nature:v:567:y:2019:i:7749:d:10.1038_s41586-019-1001-1
DOI: 10.1038/s41586-019-1001-1
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nat:nature:v:567:y:2019:i:7749:d:10.1038_s41586-019-1001-1. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.nature.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.