IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/nat/nature/v567y2019i7747d10.1038_s41586-019-0972-2.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Optical clock comparison for Lorentz symmetry testing

Author

Listed:
  • Christian Sanner

    (Physikalisch-Technische Bundesanstalt
    JILA)

  • Nils Huntemann

    (Physikalisch-Technische Bundesanstalt)

  • Richard Lange

    (Physikalisch-Technische Bundesanstalt)

  • Christian Tamm

    (Physikalisch-Technische Bundesanstalt)

  • Ekkehard Peik

    (Physikalisch-Technische Bundesanstalt)

  • Marianna S. Safronova

    (University of Delaware
    Joint Quantum Institute, National Institute of Standards and Technology and the University of Maryland)

  • Sergey G. Porsev

    (University of Delaware
    Petersburg Nuclear Physics Institute of NRC (Kurchatov Institute))

Abstract

Questioning basic assumptions about the structure of space and time has greatly enhanced our understanding of nature. State-of-the-art atomic clocks1–3 make it possible to precisely test fundamental symmetry properties of spacetime and search for physics beyond the standard model at low energies of just a few electronvolts4. Modern tests of Einstein’s theory of relativity try to measure so-far-undetected violations of Lorentz symmetry5; accurately comparing the frequencies of optical clocks is a promising route to further improving such tests6. Here we experimentally demonstrate agreement between two single-ion optical clocks at the 10−18 level, directly validating their uncertainty budgets, over a six-month comparison period. The ytterbium ions of the two clocks are confined in separate ion traps with quantization axes aligned along non-parallel directions. Hypothetical Lorentz symmetry violations5–7 would lead to periodic modulations of the frequency offset as the Earth rotates and orbits the Sun. From the absence of such modulations at the 10−19 level we deduce stringent limits of the order of 10−21 on Lorentz symmetry violation parameters for electrons, improving previous limits8–10 by two orders of magnitude. Such levels of precision will be essential for low-energy tests of future quantum gravity theories describing dynamics at the Planck scale4, which are expected to predict the magnitude of residual symmetry violations.

Suggested Citation

  • Christian Sanner & Nils Huntemann & Richard Lange & Christian Tamm & Ekkehard Peik & Marianna S. Safronova & Sergey G. Porsev, 2019. "Optical clock comparison for Lorentz symmetry testing," Nature, Nature, vol. 567(7747), pages 204-208, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:nat:nature:v:567:y:2019:i:7747:d:10.1038_s41586-019-0972-2
    DOI: 10.1038/s41586-019-0972-2
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-019-0972-2
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1038/s41586-019-0972-2?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Laura S. Dreissen & Chih-Han Yeh & Henning A. Fürst & Kai C. Grensemann & Tanja E. Mehlstäubler, 2022. "Improved bounds on Lorentz violation from composite pulse Ramsey spectroscopy in a trapped ion," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-6, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nat:nature:v:567:y:2019:i:7747:d:10.1038_s41586-019-0972-2. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.nature.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.