IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/nat/nature/v564y2018i7736d10.1038_s41586-018-0732-8.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Distinct activity-gated pathways mediate attraction and aversion to CO2 in Drosophila

Author

Listed:
  • Floris Breugel

    (California Institute of Technology
    University of Nevada)

  • Ainul Huda

    (California Institute of Technology)

  • Michael H. Dickinson

    (California Institute of Technology)

Abstract

Carbon dioxide is produced by many organic processes and is a convenient volatile cue for insects1 that are searching for blood hosts2, flowers3, communal nests4, fruit5 and wildfires6. Although Drosophila melanogaster feed on yeast that produce CO2 and ethanol during fermentation, laboratory experiments7–12 suggest that walking flies avoid CO2. Here we resolve this paradox by showing that both flying and walking Drosophila find CO2 attractive, but only when they are in an active state associated with foraging. Their aversion to CO2 at low-activity levels may be an adaptation to avoid parasites that seek CO2, or to avoid succumbing to respiratory acidosis in the presence of high concentrations of CO2 that exist in nature13,14. In contrast to CO2, flies are attracted to ethanol in all behavioural states, and invest twice the time searching near ethanol compared to CO2. These behavioural differences reflect the fact that ethanol is a unique signature of yeast fermentation, whereas CO2 is generated by many natural processes. Using genetic tools, we determined that the evolutionarily conserved ionotropic co-receptor IR25a is required for CO2 attraction, and that the receptors necessary for CO2 avoidance are not involved in this attraction. Our study lays the foundation for future research to determine the neural circuits that underlie both state- and odorant-dependent decision-making in Drosophila.

Suggested Citation

  • Floris Breugel & Ainul Huda & Michael H. Dickinson, 2018. "Distinct activity-gated pathways mediate attraction and aversion to CO2 in Drosophila," Nature, Nature, vol. 564(7736), pages 420-424, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:nat:nature:v:564:y:2018:i:7736:d:10.1038_s41586-018-0732-8
    DOI: 10.1038/s41586-018-0732-8
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-018-0732-8
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1038/s41586-018-0732-8?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Tyler R. Sizemore & Julius Jonaitis & Andrew M. Dacks, 2023. "Heterogeneous receptor expression underlies non-uniform peptidergic modulation of olfaction in Drosophila," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-22, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nat:nature:v:564:y:2018:i:7736:d:10.1038_s41586-018-0732-8. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.nature.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.