IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/nat/nature/v560y2018i7718d10.1038_s41586-018-0377-7.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Categorical perception of colour signals in a songbird

Author

Listed:
  • Eleanor M. Caves

    (Duke University)

  • Patrick A. Green

    (Duke University)

  • Matthew N. Zipple

    (Duke University)

  • Susan Peters

    (Duke University)

  • Sönke Johnsen

    (Duke University)

  • Stephen Nowicki

    (Duke University)

Abstract

In many contexts, animals assess each other using signals that vary continuously across individuals and, on average, reflect variation in the quality of the signaller1,2. It is often assumed that signal receivers perceive and respond continuously to continuous variation in the signal2. Alternatively, perception and response may be discontinuous3, owing to limitations in discrimination, categorization or both. Discrimination is the ability to tell two stimuli apart (for example, whether one can tell apart colours close to each other in hue). Categorization concerns whether stimuli are grouped based on similarities (for example, identifying colours with qualitative similarities in hue as similar even if they can be distinguished)4. Categorical perception is a mechanism by which perceptual systems categorize continuously varying stimuli, making specific predictions about discrimination relative to category boundaries. Here we show that female zebra finches (Taeniopygia guttata) categorically perceive a continuously variable assessment signal: the orange to red spectrum of male beak colour. Both predictions of categorical perception5 were supported: females (1) categorized colour stimuli that varied along a continuum and (2) showed increased discrimination between colours from opposite sides of a category boundary compared to equally different colours from within a category. To our knowledge, this is the first demonstration of categorical perception of signal-based colouration in a bird, with implications for understanding avian colour perception and signal evolution in general.

Suggested Citation

  • Eleanor M. Caves & Patrick A. Green & Matthew N. Zipple & Susan Peters & Sönke Johnsen & Stephen Nowicki, 2018. "Categorical perception of colour signals in a songbird," Nature, Nature, vol. 560(7718), pages 365-367, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:nat:nature:v:560:y:2018:i:7718:d:10.1038_s41586-018-0377-7
    DOI: 10.1038/s41586-018-0377-7
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-018-0377-7
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1038/s41586-018-0377-7?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Ossi Nokelainen & Francisko de Moraes Rezende & Janne K Valkonen & Johanna Mappes, 2022. "Context-dependent coloration of prey and predator decision making in contrasting light environments [Color contrast and stability as key elements for effective warning signals]," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 33(1), pages 77-86.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nat:nature:v:560:y:2018:i:7718:d:10.1038_s41586-018-0377-7. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.nature.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.