IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/nat/nature/v560y2018i7716d10.1038_s41586-018-0354-1.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Differential tuning of excitation and inhibition shapes direction selectivity in ferret visual cortex

Author

Listed:
  • Daniel E. Wilson

    (Max Planck Florida Institute for Neuroscience
    Florida Atlantic University
    Integrative Biology and Neuroscience Graduate Program, Florida Atlantic University
    Harvard Medical School)

  • Benjamin Scholl

    (Max Planck Florida Institute for Neuroscience)

  • David Fitzpatrick

    (Max Planck Florida Institute for Neuroscience)

Abstract

To encode specific sensory inputs, cortical neurons must generate selective responses for distinct stimulus features. In principle, a variety of factors can contribute to the response selectivity of a cortical neuron: the tuning and strength of excitatory1–3 and inhibitory synaptic inputs4–6, dendritic nonlinearities7–9 and spike threshold10,11. Here we use a combination of techniques including in vivo whole-cell recording, synaptic- and cellular-resolution in vivo two-photon calcium imaging, and GABA (γ-aminobutyric acid) neuron-selective optogenetic manipulation to dissect the factors that contribute to the direction-selective responses of layer 2/3 neurons in ferret visual cortex (V1). Two-photon calcium imaging of dendritic spines12,13 revealed that each neuron receives a mixture of excitatory synaptic inputs selective for the somatic preferred or null direction of motion. The relative number of preferred- and null-tuned excitatory inputs predicted a neuron’s somatic direction preference, but failed to account for the degree of direction selectivity. By contrast, in vivo whole-cell patch-clamp recordings revealed a notable degree of direction selectivity in subthreshold responses that was significantly correlated with spiking direction selectivity. Subthreshold direction selectivity was predicted by the magnitude and variance of the response to the null direction of motion, and several lines of evidence, including conductance measurements, demonstrate that differential tuning of excitation and inhibition suppresses responses to the null direction of motion. Consistent with this idea, optogenetic inactivation of GABAergic neurons in layer 2/3 reduced direction selectivity by enhancing responses to the null direction. Furthermore, by optogenetically mapping connections of inhibitory neurons in layer 2/3 in vivo, we find that layer 2/3 inhibitory neurons make long-range, intercolumnar projections to excitatory neurons that prefer the opposite direction of motion. We conclude that intracortical inhibition exerts a major influence on the degree of direction selectivity in layer 2/3 of ferret V1 by suppressing responses to the null direction of motion.

Suggested Citation

  • Daniel E. Wilson & Benjamin Scholl & David Fitzpatrick, 2018. "Differential tuning of excitation and inhibition shapes direction selectivity in ferret visual cortex," Nature, Nature, vol. 560(7716), pages 97-101, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:nat:nature:v:560:y:2018:i:7716:d:10.1038_s41586-018-0354-1
    DOI: 10.1038/s41586-018-0354-1
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-018-0354-1
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1038/s41586-018-0354-1?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Stanislav Ott & Sangyu Xu & Nicole Lee & Ivan Hong & Jonathan Anns & Danesha Devini Suresh & Zhiyi Zhang & Xianyuan Zhang & Raihanah Harion & Weiying Ye & Vaishnavi Chandramouli & Suresh Jesuthasan & , 2024. "Kalium channelrhodopsins effectively inhibit neurons," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 15(1), pages 1-21, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nat:nature:v:560:y:2018:i:7716:d:10.1038_s41586-018-0354-1. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.nature.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.