IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/nat/nature/v559y2018i7715d10.1038_s41586-018-0349-y.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Triple oxygen isotope evidence for limited mid-Proterozoic primary productivity

Author

Listed:
  • Peter W. Crockford

    (McGill University, Montreal
    Weizmann Institute of Science
    Princeton University)

  • Justin A. Hayles

    (Rice University
    Louisiana State University)

  • Huiming Bao

    (Louisiana State University
    School of Earth & Space Sciences, Peking University)

  • Noah J. Planavsky

    (Yale University)

  • Andrey Bekker

    (University of California Riverside)

  • Philip W. Fralick

    (Lakehead University, Thunder Bay)

  • Galen P. Halverson

    (McGill University, Montreal)

  • Thi Hao Bui

    (McGill University, Montreal)

  • Yongbo Peng

    (Louisiana State University)

  • Boswell A. Wing

    (University of Colorado Boulder)

Abstract

The global biosphere is commonly assumed to have been less productive before the rise of complex eukaryotic ecosystems than it is today1. However, direct evidence for this assertion is lacking. Here we present triple oxygen isotope measurements (∆17O) from sedimentary sulfates from the Sibley basin (Ontario, Canada) dated to about 1.4 billion years ago, which provide evidence for a less productive biosphere in the middle of the Proterozoic eon. We report what are, to our knowledge, the most-negative ∆17O values (down to −0.88‰) observed in sulfates, except for those from the terminal Cryogenian period2. This observation demonstrates that the mid-Proterozoic atmosphere was distinct from what persisted over approximately the past 0.5 billion years, directly reflecting a unique interplay among the atmospheric partial pressures of CO2 and O2 and the photosynthetic O2 flux at this time3. Oxygenic gross primary productivity is stoichiometrically related to the photosynthetic O2 flux to the atmosphere. Under current estimates of mid-Proterozoic atmospheric partial pressure of CO2 (2–30 times that of pre-anthropogenic levels), our modelling indicates that gross primary productivity was between about 6% and 41% of pre-anthropogenic levels if atmospheric O2 was between 0.1–1% or 1–10% of pre-anthropogenic levels, respectively. When compared to estimates of Archaean4–6 and Phanerozoic primary production7, these model solutions show that an increasingly more productive biosphere accompanied the broad secular pattern of increasing atmospheric O2 over geologic time8.

Suggested Citation

  • Peter W. Crockford & Justin A. Hayles & Huiming Bao & Noah J. Planavsky & Andrey Bekker & Philip W. Fralick & Galen P. Halverson & Thi Hao Bui & Yongbo Peng & Boswell A. Wing, 2018. "Triple oxygen isotope evidence for limited mid-Proterozoic primary productivity," Nature, Nature, vol. 559(7715), pages 613-616, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:nat:nature:v:559:y:2018:i:7715:d:10.1038_s41586-018-0349-y
    DOI: 10.1038/s41586-018-0349-y
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-018-0349-y
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1038/s41586-018-0349-y?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Haiyang Wang & Yongbo Peng & Chao Li & Xiaobin Cao & Meng Cheng & Huiming Bao, 2023. "Sulfate triple-oxygen-isotope evidence confirming oceanic oxygenation 570 million years ago," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-9, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nat:nature:v:559:y:2018:i:7715:d:10.1038_s41586-018-0349-y. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.nature.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.