Author
Listed:
- Nicholas A. J. Graham
(Lancaster Environment Centre, Lancaster University
ARC Centre of Excellence for Coral Reef Studies, James Cook University)
- Shaun K. Wilson
(Conservation and Attractions
Oceans Institute, University of Western Australia)
- Peter Carr
(Institute of Zoology, Zoological Society of London
College of Life and Environmental Sciences, University of Exeter)
- Andrew S. Hoey
(ARC Centre of Excellence for Coral Reef Studies, James Cook University)
- Simon Jennings
(International Council for the Exploration of the Sea)
- M. Aaron MacNeil
(Dalhousie University)
Abstract
Biotic connectivity between ecosystems can provide major transport of organic matter and nutrients, influencing ecosystem structure and productivity1, yet the implications are poorly understood owing to human disruptions of natural flows2. When abundant, seabirds feeding in the open ocean transport large quantities of nutrients onto islands, enhancing the productivity of island fauna and flora3,4. Whether leaching of these nutrients back into the sea influences the productivity, structure and functioning of adjacent coral reef ecosystems is not known. Here we address this question using a rare natural experiment in the Chagos Archipelago, in which some islands are rat-infested and others are rat-free. We found that seabird densities and nitrogen deposition rates are 760 and 251 times higher, respectively, on islands where humans have not introduced rats. Consequently, rat-free islands had substantially higher nitrogen stable isotope (δ15N) values in soils and shrubs, reflecting pelagic nutrient sources. These higher values of δ15N were also apparent in macroalgae, filter-feeding sponges, turf algae and fish on adjacent coral reefs. Herbivorous damselfish on reefs adjacent to the rat-free islands grew faster, and fish communities had higher biomass across trophic feeding groups, with 48% greater overall biomass. Rates of two critical ecosystem functions, grazing and bioerosion, were 3.2 and 3.8 times higher, respectively, adjacent to rat-free islands. Collectively, these results reveal how rat introductions disrupt nutrient flows among pelagic, island and coral reef ecosystems. Thus, rat eradication on oceanic islands should be a high conservation priority as it is likely to benefit terrestrial ecosystems and enhance coral reef productivity and functioning by restoring seabird-derived nutrient subsidies from large areas of ocean.
Suggested Citation
Nicholas A. J. Graham & Shaun K. Wilson & Peter Carr & Andrew S. Hoey & Simon Jennings & M. Aaron MacNeil, 2018.
"Seabirds enhance coral reef productivity and functioning in the absence of invasive rats,"
Nature, Nature, vol. 559(7713), pages 250-253, July.
Handle:
RePEc:nat:nature:v:559:y:2018:i:7713:d:10.1038_s41586-018-0202-3
DOI: 10.1038/s41586-018-0202-3
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.
Citations
Citations are extracted by the
CitEc Project, subscribe to its
RSS feed for this item.
Cited by:
- Carlos M. Duarte & Rebecca Cousins & Maryam A. Ficociello & Ivor D. Williams & Aradhana Khowala, 2024.
"Advancing Global Climate and Biodiversity Goals Through Regenerative Tourism,"
Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(20), pages 1-14, October.
- Rudy Vannevel & Peter L.M. Goethals, 2020.
"Identifying Ecosystem Key Factors to Support Sustainable Water Management,"
Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-23, February.
- S. Kathleen Barnhill-Dilling & Megan Serr & Dimitri V. Blondel & John Godwin, 2019.
"Sustainability as a Framework for Considering Gene Drive Mice for Invasive Rodent Eradication,"
Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(5), pages 1-12, March.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nat:nature:v:559:y:2018:i:7713:d:10.1038_s41586-018-0202-3. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.nature.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.