IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/nat/nature/v559y2018i7712d10.1038_s41586-018-0260-6.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Spatial correlation bias in late-Cenozoic erosion histories derived from thermochronology

Author

Listed:
  • Taylor F. Schildgen

    (GFZ German Research Centre for Geosciences, Telegrafenberg
    University of Potsdam)

  • Pieter A. Beek

    (Université Grenoble Alpes, Institut des Sciences de la Terre (ISTerre))

  • Hugh D. Sinclair

    (School of Geosciences, The University of Edinburgh)

  • Rasmus C. Thiede

    (University of Potsdam
    Institut für Geowissenschaften, Christian Albrecht Universität zu Kiel)

Abstract

The potential link between erosion rates at the Earth’s surface and changes in global climate has intrigued geoscientists for decades1,2 because such a coupling has implications for the influence of silicate weathering3,4 and organic-carbon burial5 on climate and for the role of Quaternary glaciations in landscape evolution1,6. A global increase in late-Cenozoic erosion rates in response to a cooling, more variable climate has been proposed on the basis of worldwide sedimentation rates7. Other studies have indicated, however, that global erosion rates may have remained steady, suggesting that the reported increases in sediment-accumulation rates are due to preservation biases, depositional hiatuses and varying measurement intervals8–10. More recently, a global compilation of thermochronology data has been used to infer a nearly twofold increase in the erosion rate in mountainous landscapes over late-Cenozoic times6. It has been contended that this result is free of the biases that affect sedimentary records11, although others have argued that it contains biases related to how thermochronological data are averaged12 and to erosion hiatuses in glaciated landscapes13. Here we investigate the 30 locations with reported accelerated erosion during the late Cenozoic6. Our analysis shows that in 23 of these locations, the reported increases are a result of a spatial correlation bias—that is, combining data with disparate exhumation histories, thereby converting spatial erosion-rate variations into temporal increases. In four locations, the increases can be explained by changes in tectonic boundary conditions. In three cases, climatically induced accelerations are recorded, driven by localized glacial valley incision. Our findings suggest that thermochronology data currently have insufficient resolution to assess whether late-Cenozoic climate change affected erosion rates on a global scale. We suggest that a synthesis of local findings that include location-specific information may help to further investigate drivers of global erosion rates.

Suggested Citation

  • Taylor F. Schildgen & Pieter A. Beek & Hugh D. Sinclair & Rasmus C. Thiede, 2018. "Spatial correlation bias in late-Cenozoic erosion histories derived from thermochronology," Nature, Nature, vol. 559(7712), pages 89-93, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:nat:nature:v:559:y:2018:i:7712:d:10.1038_s41586-018-0260-6
    DOI: 10.1038/s41586-018-0260-6
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-018-0260-6
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1038/s41586-018-0260-6?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nat:nature:v:559:y:2018:i:7712:d:10.1038_s41586-018-0260-6. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.nature.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.