IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/nat/nature/v557y2018i7707d10.1038_d41586-018-05256-0.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Before reproducibility must come preproducibility

Author

Listed:
  • Philip B. Stark

Abstract

Instead of arguing about whether results hold up, let’s push to provide enough information for others to repeat the experiments, says Philip Stark.

Suggested Citation

  • Philip B. Stark, 2018. "Before reproducibility must come preproducibility," Nature, Nature, vol. 557(7707), pages 613-613, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:nat:nature:v:557:y:2018:i:7707:d:10.1038_d41586-018-05256-0
    DOI: 10.1038/d41586-018-05256-0
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-018-05256-0
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1038/d41586-018-05256-0?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Matthew R Behrend & María-Gloria Basáñez & Jonathan I D Hamley & Travis C Porco & Wilma A Stolk & Martin Walker & Sake J de Vlas & for the NTD Modelling Consortium, 2020. "Modelling for policy: The five principles of the Neglected Tropical Diseases Modelling Consortium," PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(4), pages 1-17, April.
    2. Sylvérie Herbert & Hautahi Kingi & Flavio Stanchi & Lars Vilhuber, 2024. "Reproduce to validate: A comprehensive study on the reproducibility of economics research," Canadian Journal of Economics/Revue canadienne d'économique, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 57(3), pages 961-988, August.
    3. Felix Holzmeister & Magnus Johannesson & Robert Böhm & Anna Dreber & Jürgen Huber & Michael Kirchler, 2023. "Heterogeneity in effect size estimates: Empirical evidence and practical implications," Working Papers 2023-17, Faculty of Economics and Statistics, Universität Innsbruck.
    4. Kathleen E Lotterhos & Jason H Moore & Ann E Stapleton, 2018. "Analysis validation has been neglected in the Age of Reproducibility," PLOS Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(12), pages 1-15, December.
    5. Sylvérie Herbert & Hautahi Kingi & Flavio Stanchi & Lars Vilhubern, 2021. "The Reproducibility of Economics Research: A Case Study," Working papers 853, Banque de France.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nat:nature:v:557:y:2018:i:7707:d:10.1038_d41586-018-05256-0. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.nature.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.