IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/nat/nature/v554y2018i7691d10.1038_nature25479.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Biomechanics of predator–prey arms race in lion, zebra, cheetah and impala

Author

Listed:
  • Alan M. Wilson

    (Structure & Motion Lab, Royal Veterinary College, University of London)

  • Tatjana Y. Hubel

    (Structure & Motion Lab, Royal Veterinary College, University of London)

  • Simon D. Wilshin

    (Structure & Motion Lab, Royal Veterinary College, University of London)

  • John C. Lowe

    (Structure & Motion Lab, Royal Veterinary College, University of London)

  • Maja Lorenc

    (Structure & Motion Lab, Royal Veterinary College, University of London)

  • Oliver P. Dewhirst

    (Structure & Motion Lab, Royal Veterinary College, University of London)

  • Hattie L. A. Bartlam-Brooks

    (Structure & Motion Lab, Royal Veterinary College, University of London)

  • Rebecca Diack

    (Structure & Motion Lab, Royal Veterinary College, University of London)

  • Emily Bennitt

    (Okavango Research Institute, University of Botswana)

  • Krystyna A. Golabek

    (Botswana Predator Conservation Trust)

  • Roger C. Woledge

    (Structure & Motion Lab, Royal Veterinary College, University of London)

  • J. Weldon McNutt

    (Botswana Predator Conservation Trust)

  • Nancy A. Curtin

    (Structure & Motion Lab, Royal Veterinary College, University of London)

  • Timothy G. West

    (Structure & Motion Lab, Royal Veterinary College, University of London)

Abstract

The fastest and most manoeuvrable terrestrial animals are found in savannah habitats, where predators chase and capture running prey. Hunt outcome and success rate are critical to survival, so both predator and prey should evolve to be faster and/or more manoeuvrable. Here we compare locomotor characteristics in two pursuit predator–prey pairs, lion–zebra and cheetah–impala, in their natural savannah habitat in Botswana. We show that although cheetahs and impalas were universally more athletic than lions and zebras in terms of speed, acceleration and turning, within each predator–prey pair, the predators had 20% higher muscle fibre power than prey, 37% greater acceleration and 72% greater deceleration capacity than their prey. We simulated hunt dynamics with these data and showed that hunts at lower speeds enable prey to use their maximum manoeuvring capacity and favour prey survival, and that the predator needs to be more athletic than its prey to sustain a viable success rate.

Suggested Citation

  • Alan M. Wilson & Tatjana Y. Hubel & Simon D. Wilshin & John C. Lowe & Maja Lorenc & Oliver P. Dewhirst & Hattie L. A. Bartlam-Brooks & Rebecca Diack & Emily Bennitt & Krystyna A. Golabek & Roger C. Wo, 2018. "Biomechanics of predator–prey arms race in lion, zebra, cheetah and impala," Nature, Nature, vol. 554(7691), pages 183-188, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:nat:nature:v:554:y:2018:i:7691:d:10.1038_nature25479
    DOI: 10.1038/nature25479
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.nature.com/articles/nature25479
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1038/nature25479?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Zhiwei Liu & Wencheng Zhan & Xinyi Liu & Yangsheng Zhu & Mingjing Qi & Jiaming Leng & Lizhao Wei & Shousheng Han & Xiaoming Wu & Xiaojun Yan, 2024. "A wireless controlled robotic insect with ultrafast untethered running speeds," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 15(1), pages 1-15, December.
    2. Xingxing Ke & Haochen Yong & Fukang Xu & Han Ding & Zhigang Wu, 2024. "Stenus-inspired, swift, and agile untethered insect-scale soft propulsors," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 15(1), pages 1-14, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nat:nature:v:554:y:2018:i:7691:d:10.1038_nature25479. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.nature.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.