IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/nat/nature/v540y2016i7634d10.1038_540525d.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Journals, agree on manuscript format

Author

Listed:
  • Quanmin Guo

    (University of Birmingham)

Abstract

No abstract is available for this item.

Suggested Citation

  • Quanmin Guo, 2016. "Journals, agree on manuscript format," Nature, Nature, vol. 540(7634), pages 525-525, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:nat:nature:v:540:y:2016:i:7634:d:10.1038_540525d
    DOI: 10.1038/540525d
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.nature.com/articles/540525d
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1038/540525d?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Hans Oh, 2020. "A Call for a More Efficient Submission Process," Publications, MDPI, vol. 8(3), pages 1-3, July.
    2. Manoj Kumar Jaiswal & Ram Nath Jaiswal, 2018. "A Unified Format for Manuscript Structure, Style and Reference Citation across the Journals," Open Access Journal of Neurology & Neurosurgery, Juniper Publishers Inc., vol. 7(4), pages 70-72, April.
    3. Geoff G. Cole & Ellie Benfield & Steven Samuel, 2024. "Format-Free Submissions in Psychology-Related Journals," Publications, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-6, September.
    4. Allana G LeBlanc & Joel D Barnes & Travis J Saunders & Mark S Tremblay & Jean-Philippe Chaput, 2019. "Scientific sinkhole: The pernicious price of formatting," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(9), pages 1-7, September.
    5. Yan Jiang & Robert Lerrigo & Anika Ullah & Muthu Alagappan & Steven M Asch & Steven N Goodman & Sidhartha R Sinha, 2019. "The high resource impact of reformatting requirements for scientific papers," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(10), pages 1-13, October.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nat:nature:v:540:y:2016:i:7634:d:10.1038_540525d. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.nature.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.