Author
Listed:
- Pierre Nouvellet
(MRC Centre for Outbreak Analysis and Modelling, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London)
- Tini Garske
(MRC Centre for Outbreak Analysis and Modelling, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London)
- Harriet L. Mills
(MRC Centre for Outbreak Analysis and Modelling, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London)
- Gemma Nedjati-Gilani
(MRC Centre for Outbreak Analysis and Modelling, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London)
- Wes Hinsley
(MRC Centre for Outbreak Analysis and Modelling, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London)
- Isobel M. Blake
(MRC Centre for Outbreak Analysis and Modelling, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London)
- Maria D. Van Kerkhove
(MRC Centre for Outbreak Analysis and Modelling, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London
Center for Global Health, Institut Pasteur, 25 rue du Docteur Roux, 75724 Paris Cedex 15, France.)
- Anne Cori
(MRC Centre for Outbreak Analysis and Modelling, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London)
- Ilaria Dorigatti
(MRC Centre for Outbreak Analysis and Modelling, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London)
- Thibaut Jombart
(MRC Centre for Outbreak Analysis and Modelling, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London)
- Steven Riley
(MRC Centre for Outbreak Analysis and Modelling, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London)
- Christophe Fraser
(MRC Centre for Outbreak Analysis and Modelling, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London)
- Christl A. Donnelly
(MRC Centre for Outbreak Analysis and Modelling, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London)
- Neil M. Ferguson
(MRC Centre for Outbreak Analysis and Modelling, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London)
Abstract
Ebola emerged in West Africa around December 2013 and swept through Guinea, Sierra Leone and Liberia, giving rise to 27,748 confirmed, probable and suspected cases reported by 29 July 2015. Case diagnoses during the epidemic have relied on polymerase chain reaction-based tests. Owing to limited laboratory capacity and local transport infrastructure, the delays from sample collection to test results being available have often been 2 days or more. Point-of-care rapid diagnostic tests offer the potential to substantially reduce these delays. We review Ebola rapid diagnostic tests approved by the World Health Organization and those currently in development. Such rapid diagnostic tests could allow early triaging of patients, thereby reducing the potential for nosocomial transmission. In addition, despite the lower test accuracy, rapid diagnostic test-based diagnosis may be beneficial in some contexts because of the reduced time spent by uninfected individuals in health-care settings where they may be at increased risk of infection; this also frees up hospital beds. We use mathematical modelling to explore the potential benefits of diagnostic testing strategies involving rapid diagnostic tests alone and in combination with polymerase chain reaction testing. Our analysis indicates that the use of rapid diagnostic tests with sensitivity and specificity comparable with those currently under development always enhances control, whether evaluated at a health-care-unit or population level. If such tests had been available throughout the recent epidemic, we estimate, for Sierra Leone, that their use in combination with confirmatory polymerase chain-reaction testing might have reduced the scale of the epidemic by over a third. This article has not been written or reviewed by Nature editors. Nature accepts no responsibility for the accuracy of the information provided.
Suggested Citation
Pierre Nouvellet & Tini Garske & Harriet L. Mills & Gemma Nedjati-Gilani & Wes Hinsley & Isobel M. Blake & Maria D. Van Kerkhove & Anne Cori & Ilaria Dorigatti & Thibaut Jombart & Steven Riley & Chris, 2015.
"The role of rapid diagnostics in managing Ebola epidemics,"
Nature, Nature, vol. 528(7580), pages 109-116, December.
Handle:
RePEc:nat:nature:v:528:y:2015:i:7580:d:10.1038_nature16041
DOI: 10.1038/nature16041
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nat:nature:v:528:y:2015:i:7580:d:10.1038_nature16041. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.nature.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.