IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/nat/nature/v503y2013i7476d10.1038_503333a.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Reproducibility: The risks of the replication drive

Author

Listed:
  • Mina Bissell

    (Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, California 94720, USA.)

Abstract

The push to replicate findings could shelve promising research and unfairly damage the reputations of careful, meticulous scientists, says Mina Bissell.

Suggested Citation

  • Mina Bissell, 2013. "Reproducibility: The risks of the replication drive," Nature, Nature, vol. 503(7476), pages 333-334, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:nat:nature:v:503:y:2013:i:7476:d:10.1038_503333a
    DOI: 10.1038/503333a
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.nature.com/articles/503333a
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1038/503333a?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Daniel Benjamin & David R Mandel & Jonathan Kimmelman, 2017. "Can cancer researchers accurately judge whether preclinical reports will reproduce?," PLOS Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(6), pages 1-17, June.
    2. Maren Duvendack & Richard W. Palmer-Jones & W. Robert Reed, 2015. "Replications in Economics: A Progress Report," Econ Journal Watch, Econ Journal Watch, vol. 12(2), pages 164–191-1, May.
    3. Brand, Charlotte Olivia & Ounsley, James & van der Post, Daniel & Morgan, Tom, 2017. "Cumulative science via Bayesian posterior passing, an introduction," SocArXiv 67jh7, Center for Open Science.
    4. Richard McElreath & Paul E Smaldino, 2015. "Replication, Communication, and the Population Dynamics of Scientific Discovery," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(8), pages 1-16, August.
    5. Stallinga Peter & Khmelinskii Igor, 2015. "Consensus in science," Monte Carlo Methods and Applications, De Gruyter, vol. 21(1), pages 69-76, March.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nat:nature:v:503:y:2013:i:7476:d:10.1038_503333a. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.nature.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.