IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/nat/nature/v502y2013i7472d10.1038_nature12620.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Controversy about ultrahard nanotwinned cBN

Author

Listed:
  • Natalia Dubrovinskaia

    (Material Physics and Technology at Extreme Conditions, Laboratory of Crystallography, University of Bayreuth, 95440 Bayreuth, Germany)

  • Leonid Dubrovinsky

    (Bayerisches Geoinstitut, University of Bayreuth, 95440 Bayreuth, Germany)

Abstract

Arising from Y. Tian et al. Nature 493, 385–388 (2013)10.1038/nature11728 Tian et al.1 report synthesis of “nanotwinned” cubic boron nitride (“nt-cBN”). These authors claim that its unprecedented Vickers hardness of 108 GPa is due to nanotwinning, and that hardening of cBN is continuous with decreasing twin thickness down to the smallest size investigated, in contrast to the expected reverse Hall–Petch effect. We demonstrate here that it has been known for tens of years that “nt-cBN” (refs 2–4) hardens owing to a complex of phenomena associated with its microstructure and defects; we also consider that Tian et al.1 provide no proof that the hardness of “nt-cBN” is larger than 85 GPa, which is the previously reported maximum for nanostructured boron nitride2,4. Thus the claim of continuous hardening down to a few nanometres twin thickness is, in our opinion, unjustified. There is a Reply to this Brief Communication Arising by Tian, Y. et al. Nature 502, http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature12621 (2013).

Suggested Citation

  • Natalia Dubrovinskaia & Leonid Dubrovinsky, 2013. "Controversy about ultrahard nanotwinned cBN," Nature, Nature, vol. 502(7472), pages 1-2, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:nat:nature:v:502:y:2013:i:7472:d:10.1038_nature12620
    DOI: 10.1038/nature12620
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.nature.com/articles/nature12620
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1038/nature12620?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nat:nature:v:502:y:2013:i:7472:d:10.1038_nature12620. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.nature.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.