IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/nat/nature/v498y2013i7452d10.1038_nature12195.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Rand et al. reply

Author

Listed:
  • David G. Rand

    (Program for Evolutionary Dynamics, Harvard University
    Harvard University
    Yale University)

  • Joshua D. Greene

    (Harvard University)

  • Martin A. Nowak

    (Program for Evolutionary Dynamics, Harvard University
    Harvard University
    Harvard University)

Abstract

replying to G. Tinghög et al. Nature498,http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature12194(2013) Tinghög et al.1 take issue with two of the ten experiments in our paper2 (studies 6 and 7). Here we reanalyse the data from these experiments as suggested by Tinghög et al.1, and demonstrate that our reported positive effect of time pressure on cooperation is not an artefact. Furthermore, an aggregate analysis based on fifteen studies and 6,910 decisions also replicates this effect3.

Suggested Citation

  • David G. Rand & Joshua D. Greene & Martin A. Nowak, 2013. "Rand et al. reply," Nature, Nature, vol. 498(7452), pages 2-3, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:nat:nature:v:498:y:2013:i:7452:d:10.1038_nature12195
    DOI: 10.1038/nature12195
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.nature.com/articles/nature12195
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1038/nature12195?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Recalde, M.P. & Riedl, A.M. & Vesterlund, L., 2014. "Error prone inference from respons time: The case of intuitive generosity," Research Memorandum 034, Maastricht University, Graduate School of Business and Economics (GSBE).
    2. Recalde, María P. & Riedl, Arno & Vesterlund, Lise, 2018. "Error-prone inference from response time: The case of intuitive generosity in public-good games," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 160(C), pages 132-147.
    3. Engel, Christoph & Rand, David G., 2014. "What does “clean” really mean? The implicit framing of decontextualized experiments," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 122(3), pages 386-389.
    4. Myrseth, Kristian Ove R. & Wollbrant, Conny E., 2017. "Cognitive foundations of cooperation revisited: Commentary on Rand et al. (2012, 2014)," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics (formerly The Journal of Socio-Economics), Elsevier, vol. 69(C), pages 133-138.
    5. Lindner, Florian & Rose, Julia, 2017. "No need for more time: Intertemporal allocation decisions under time pressure," Journal of Economic Psychology, Elsevier, vol. 60(C), pages 53-70.
    6. Sebastian Lotz, 2015. "Spontaneous Giving under Structural Inequality: Intuition Promotes Cooperation in Asymmetric Social Dilemmas," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(7), pages 1-9, July.
    7. Myrseth, Kristian Ove R. & Wollbrant, Conny E., 2015. "Intuitive cooperation refuted: Commentary on Rand et al. (2012) and Rand et al. (2014)," Working Papers in Economics 617, University of Gothenburg, Department of Economics, revised Aug 2016.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nat:nature:v:498:y:2013:i:7452:d:10.1038_nature12195. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.nature.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.