IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/nat/nature/v498y2013i7452d10.1038_nature12153.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Rats maintain an overhead binocular field at the expense of constant fusion

Author

Listed:
  • Damian J. Wallace

    (Network Imaging Group, Max Planck Institute for Biological Cybernetics, Spemannstraße 41, 72076 Tübingen, Germany)

  • David S. Greenberg

    (Network Imaging Group, Max Planck Institute for Biological Cybernetics, Spemannstraße 41, 72076 Tübingen, Germany)

  • Juergen Sawinski

    (Network Imaging Group, Max Planck Institute for Biological Cybernetics, Spemannstraße 41, 72076 Tübingen, Germany)

  • Stefanie Rulla

    (Network Imaging Group, Max Planck Institute for Biological Cybernetics, Spemannstraße 41, 72076 Tübingen, Germany)

  • Giuseppe Notaro

    (Network Imaging Group, Max Planck Institute for Biological Cybernetics, Spemannstraße 41, 72076 Tübingen, Germany
    Bernstein Center for Computational Neuroscience Tübingen, Spemannstraße 41, 72076 Tübingen, Germany)

  • Jason N. D. Kerr

    (Network Imaging Group, Max Planck Institute for Biological Cybernetics, Spemannstraße 41, 72076 Tübingen, Germany
    Bernstein Center for Computational Neuroscience Tübingen, Spemannstraße 41, 72076 Tübingen, Germany)

Abstract

Fusing left and right eye images into a single view is dependent on precise ocular alignment, which relies on coordinated eye movements. During movements of the head this alignment is maintained by numerous reflexes. Although rodents share with other mammals the key components of eye movement control, the coordination of eye movements in freely moving rodents is unknown. Here we show that movements of the two eyes in freely moving rats differ fundamentally from the precisely controlled eye movements used by other mammals to maintain continuous binocular fusion. The observed eye movements serve to keep the visual fields of the two eyes continuously overlapping above the animal during free movement, but not continuously aligned. Overhead visual stimuli presented to rats freely exploring an open arena evoke an immediate shelter-seeking behaviour, but are ineffective when presented beside the arena. We suggest that continuously overlapping visual fields overhead would be of evolutionary benefit for predator detection by minimizing blind spots.

Suggested Citation

  • Damian J. Wallace & David S. Greenberg & Juergen Sawinski & Stefanie Rulla & Giuseppe Notaro & Jason N. D. Kerr, 2013. "Rats maintain an overhead binocular field at the expense of constant fusion," Nature, Nature, vol. 498(7452), pages 65-69, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:nat:nature:v:498:y:2013:i:7452:d:10.1038_nature12153
    DOI: 10.1038/nature12153
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.nature.com/articles/nature12153
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1038/nature12153?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nat:nature:v:498:y:2013:i:7452:d:10.1038_nature12153. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.nature.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.