IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/nat/nature/v467y2010i7312d10.1038_467153d.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Chinese journal finds 31% of submissions plagiarized

Author

Listed:
  • Yuehong Zhang

    (Journal of Zhejiang University–Science)

Abstract

No abstract is available for this item.

Suggested Citation

  • Yuehong Zhang, 2010. "Chinese journal finds 31% of submissions plagiarized," Nature, Nature, vol. 467(7312), pages 153-153, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:nat:nature:v:467:y:2010:i:7312:d:10.1038_467153d
    DOI: 10.1038/467153d
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.nature.com/articles/467153d
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1038/467153d?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Kiran Sharma, 2021. "Team size and retracted citations reveal the patterns of retractions from 1981 to 2020," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 126(10), pages 8363-8374, October.
    2. Cao Yuan & Zhao Yong, 2021. "Procedures and Principles of Disposal of Research Misconduct in Japan From the Perspective of Case Analysis," SAGE Open, , vol. 11(4), pages 21582440211, November.
    3. Wei Chen & Qin-Rui Xing & Hui Wang & Tao Wang, 2018. "Retracted publications in the biomedical literature with authors from mainland China," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 114(1), pages 217-227, January.
    4. Vanja Pupovac, 2021. "The frequency of plagiarism identified by text-matching software in scientific articles: a systematic review and meta-analysis," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 126(11), pages 8981-9003, November.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nat:nature:v:467:y:2010:i:7312:d:10.1038_467153d. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.nature.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.