IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/nat/nature/v464y2010i7286d10.1038_nature08852.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Somatic sex identity is cell autonomous in the chicken

Author

Listed:
  • D. Zhao

    (Division of Developmental Biology and,)

  • D. McBride

    (Division of Developmental Biology and,)

  • S. Nandi

    (Division of Developmental Biology and,)

  • H. A. McQueen

    (Institute of Cell Biology, University of Edinburgh, West Mains Road, Edinburgh EH9 3JR, UK)

  • M. J. McGrew

    (Division of Developmental Biology and,)

  • P. M. Hocking

    (The Roslin Institute and Royal (Dick) School of Veterinary Studies, University of Edinburgh, Roslin, Midlothian EH25 9PS, UK)

  • P. D. Lewis

    (University of KwaZulu-Natal)

  • H. M. Sang

    (Division of Developmental Biology and,)

  • M. Clinton

    (Division of Developmental Biology and,)

Abstract

In the mammalian model of sex determination, embryos are considered to be sexually indifferent until the transient action of a sex-determining gene initiates gonadal differentiation. Although this model is thought to apply to all vertebrates, this has yet to be established. Here we have examined three lateral gynandromorph chickens (a rare, naturally occurring phenomenon in which one side of the animal appears male and the other female) to investigate the sex-determining mechanism in birds. These studies demonstrated that gynandromorph birds are genuine male:female chimaeras, and indicated that male and female avian somatic cells may have an inherent sex identity. To test this hypothesis, we transplanted presumptive mesoderm between embryos of reciprocal sexes to generate embryos containing male:female chimaeric gonads. In contrast to the outcome for mammalian mixed-sex chimaeras, in chicken mixed-sex chimaeras the donor cells were excluded from the functional structures of the host gonad. In an example where female tissue was transplanted into a male host, donor cells contributing to the developing testis retained a female identity and expressed a marker of female function. Our study demonstrates that avian somatic cells possess an inherent sex identity and that, in birds, sexual differentiation is substantively cell autonomous.

Suggested Citation

  • D. Zhao & D. McBride & S. Nandi & H. A. McQueen & M. J. McGrew & P. M. Hocking & P. D. Lewis & H. M. Sang & M. Clinton, 2010. "Somatic sex identity is cell autonomous in the chicken," Nature, Nature, vol. 464(7286), pages 237-242, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:nat:nature:v:464:y:2010:i:7286:d:10.1038_nature08852
    DOI: 10.1038/nature08852
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.nature.com/articles/nature08852
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1038/nature08852?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Makhsud Tagirov, 2015. "The chimeric embryo hypothesis as a mechanism of avian sex ratio manipulation: a reply to Szász and Rosivall," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 26(5), pages 4-5.
    2. Kamila Lengyel & Mekhla Rudra & Tom V. L. Berghof & Albertine Leitão & Carolina Frankl-Vilches & Falk Dittrich & Denise Duda & Romina Klinger & Sabrina Schleibinger & Hicham Sid & Lisa Trost & Hanna V, 2024. "Unveiling the critical role of androgen receptor signaling in avian sexual development," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 15(1), pages 1-12, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nat:nature:v:464:y:2010:i:7286:d:10.1038_nature08852. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.nature.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.