IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/nat/nature/v450y2007i7169d10.1038_nature06288.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Social evaluation by preverbal infants

Author

Listed:
  • J. Kiley Hamlin

    (Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut 06520-8205, USA)

  • Karen Wynn

    (Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut 06520-8205, USA)

  • Paul Bloom

    (Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut 06520-8205, USA)

Abstract

Morality starts young The key to successful social interactions is the ability to assess others' intentions — be they friend or foe. A new study in 6- and 10-month-old infants shows that humans engage in social evaluations even earlier than was thought, before they can use language. The infants could evaluate actors on the basis of their social acts — they were drawn towards an individual who helps an unrelated third party to achieve his or her goal, and they avoided an individual who hinders a third party's efforts to achieve a goal. The findings support the claim that precursors to adult-like social evaluation are present even in babies. This skill could be a biological adaptation that may also serve as the foundation for moral thought and action later in life.

Suggested Citation

  • J. Kiley Hamlin & Karen Wynn & Paul Bloom, 2007. "Social evaluation by preverbal infants," Nature, Nature, vol. 450(7169), pages 557-559, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:nat:nature:v:450:y:2007:i:7169:d:10.1038_nature06288
    DOI: 10.1038/nature06288
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.nature.com/articles/nature06288
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1038/nature06288?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Kyong-sun Jin & Fransisca Ting & Zijing He & Renée Baillargeon, 2024. "Infants expect some degree of positive and negative reciprocity between strangers," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 15(1), pages 1-13, December.
    2. John Hartwick, 2010. "Encephalization and division of labor by early humans," Journal of Bioeconomics, Springer, vol. 12(2), pages 77-100, July.
    3. Young-eun Lee & Jung-eun Ellie Yun & Eun Young Kim & Hyun-joo Song, 2015. "The Development of Infants’ Sensitivity to Behavioral Intentions when Inferring Others’ Social Preferences," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(9), pages 1-16, September.
    4. Geoffrey Hodgson, 2014. "The evolution of morality and the end of economic man," Journal of Evolutionary Economics, Springer, vol. 24(1), pages 83-106, January.
    5. Mitsuhiko Ishikawa & Yun-hee Park & Michiteru Kitazaki & Shoji Itakura, 2017. "Social information affects adults’ evaluation of fairness in distributions: An ERP approach," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(2), pages 1-13, February.
    6. Miguel Angel Fuentes & Juan Pablo Cárdenas & Natalia Carro & Mariana Lozada, 2018. "Development and Complex Dynamics at School Environment," Complexity, Hindawi, vol. 2018, pages 1-10, December.
    7. Fernando P Santos & Francisco C Santos & Jorge M Pacheco, 2016. "Social Norms of Cooperation in Small-Scale Societies," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(1), pages 1-13, January.
    8. Zhao, Liang, 2008. "Rethinking basically Economic Assumption on Individual Behavior from Empirical Viewpoints of Evolution and Behavior," MPRA Paper 11152, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    9. Pablo Medina & Eric Goles & Roberto Zarama & Sergio Rica, 2017. "Self-Organized Societies: On the Sakoda Model of Social Interactions," Complexity, Hindawi, vol. 2017, pages 1-16, January.
    10. Jessica Bregant & Alex Shaw & Katherine D. Kinzler, 2016. "Intuitive Jurisprudence: Early Reasoning About the Functions of Punishment," Journal of Empirical Legal Studies, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 13(4), pages 693-717, December.
    11. Marek Meristo & Luca Surian, 2014. "Infants Distinguish Antisocial Actions Directed towards Fair and Unfair Agents," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(10), pages 1-7, October.
    12. Liang, Zhao, 2009. "Reexamination of Individual Knowledge and Common Behavior Rules: A Cross-disciplinary View Based on Empirical Evidences," MPRA Paper 20050, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    13. Manasi Malik & Leyla Isik, 2023. "Relational visual representations underlie human social interaction recognition," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-11, December.
    14. Elena Nava & Emanuela Croci & Chiara Turati, 2019. "‘I see you sharing, thus I share with you’: indirect reciprocity in toddlers but not infants," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 5(1), pages 1-9, December.
    15. Gabriele Chierchia & Fabio Tufano & Giorgio Coricelli, 2017. "Friends or Strangers? Strategic Uncertainty and Cooperation across Experimental Games of Strategic Complements and Substitutes," Discussion Papers 2017-03, The Centre for Decision Research and Experimental Economics, School of Economics, University of Nottingham.
    16. Arian Petoft & Mahmoud Abbasi, 2022. "Children’s Criminal Perception; Lessons from Neurolaw," Child Indicators Research, Springer;The International Society of Child Indicators (ISCI), vol. 15(5), pages 1905-1920, October.
    17. Yasuhiro Kanakogi & Michiko Miyazaki & Hideyuki Takahashi & Hiroki Yamamoto & Tessei Kobayashi & Kazuo Hiraki, 2022. "Third-party punishment by preverbal infants," Nature Human Behaviour, Nature, vol. 6(9), pages 1234-1242, September.
    18. Yin Wang & Antonia F de C Hamilton, 2013. "Understanding the Role of the ‘Self’ in the Social Priming of Mimicry," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 8(4), pages 1-11, April.
    19. Rahul Sur, 2020. "The Logical Case for Love as an Ingredient in Policy Formulation After COVID‐19," Global Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 11(5), pages 636-646, November.
    20. Elena Vaporova & Norbert Zmyj, 2020. "Social evaluation and imitation of prosocial and antisocial agents in infants, children, and adults," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(9), pages 1-16, September.
    21. Claire Holvoet & Thomas Arciszewski & Céline Scola & Delphine Picard, 2018. "Infants’ Visual Preferences for Prosocial Behavior and Other-Race Characters at 6 Months: An Eye-Tracking Study," SAGE Open, , vol. 8(2), pages 21582440187, June.
    22. Molnar-Szakacs, Istvan, 2011. "From actions to empathy and morality - A neural perspective," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 77(1), pages 76-85, January.
    23. Mark D. Ramirez, 2021. "Understanding public blame attributions when private contractors are responsible for civilian casualties," Policy Sciences, Springer;Society of Policy Sciences, vol. 54(1), pages 21-40, March.
    24. Fazekas, Károly, 2016. "Tisztesség, empátia, közgazdaságtan [Honour, empathy and economics]," Közgazdasági Szemle (Economic Review - monthly of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences), Közgazdasági Szemle Alapítvány (Economic Review Foundation), vol. 0(10), pages 1120-1141.
    25. J Kiley Hamlin & Andrew S Baron, 2014. "Agency Attribution in Infancy: Evidence for a Negativity Bias," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(5), pages 1-8, May.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nat:nature:v:450:y:2007:i:7169:d:10.1038_nature06288. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.nature.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.