IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/nat/nature/v436y2005i7047d10.1038_nature03600.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Assessment of Mars Exploration Rover landing site predictions

Author

Listed:
  • M. P. Golombek

    (California Institute of Technology)

  • R. E. Arvidson

    (Washington University)

  • J. F. Bell

    (Cornell University)

  • P. R. Christensen

    (Arizona State University)

  • J. A. Crisp

    (California Institute of Technology)

  • L. S. Crumpler

    (New Mexico Museum of Natural History and Science)

  • B. L. Ehlmann

    (Oxford University)

  • R. L. Fergason

    (Arizona State University)

  • J. A. Grant

    (Smithsonian Institution)

  • R. Greeley

    (Arizona State University)

  • A. F. C. Haldemann

    (California Institute of Technology)

  • D. M. Kass

    (California Institute of Technology)

  • T. J. Parker

    (California Institute of Technology)

  • J. T. Schofield

    (California Institute of Technology)

  • S. W. Squyres

    (Cornell University)

  • R. W. Zurek

    (California Institute of Technology)

Abstract

Comprehensive analyses of remote sensing data during the three-year effort to select the Mars Exploration Rover landing sites at Gusev crater and at Meridiani Planum correctly predicted the atmospheric density profile during entry and descent and the safe and trafficable surfaces explored by the two rovers. The Gusev crater site was correctly predicted to be a low-relief surface that was less rocky than the Viking landing sites but comparably dusty. A dark, low-albedo, flat plain composed of basaltic sand and haematite with very few rocks was expected and found at Meridiani Planum. These results argue that future efforts to select safe landing sites based on existing and acquired remote sensing data will be successful. In contrast, geological interpretations of the sites based on remote sensing data were less certain and less successful, which emphasizes the inherent ambiguities in understanding surface geology from remotely sensed data and the uncertainty in predicting exactly what materials will be available for study at a landing site.

Suggested Citation

  • M. P. Golombek & R. E. Arvidson & J. F. Bell & P. R. Christensen & J. A. Crisp & L. S. Crumpler & B. L. Ehlmann & R. L. Fergason & J. A. Grant & R. Greeley & A. F. C. Haldemann & D. M. Kass & T. J. Pa, 2005. "Assessment of Mars Exploration Rover landing site predictions," Nature, Nature, vol. 436(7047), pages 44-48, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:nat:nature:v:436:y:2005:i:7047:d:10.1038_nature03600
    DOI: 10.1038/nature03600
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.nature.com/articles/nature03600
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1038/nature03600?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. MarĂ­a-Paz Zorzano, 2020. "Gender Balance in Mars Exploration: Lessons Learned from the Mars Science Laboratory," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(24), pages 1-11, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nat:nature:v:436:y:2005:i:7047:d:10.1038_nature03600. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.nature.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.