IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/nat/nature/v432y2004i7015d10.1038_nature03031.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Spatial patterns in species distributions reveal biodiversity change

Author

Listed:
  • Robert J. Wilson

    (University of Leeds
    Universidad Rey Juan Carlos)

  • Chris D. Thomas

    (University of Leeds
    University of York)

  • Richard Fox

    (Butterfly Conservation)

  • David B. Roy

    (NERC Centre for Ecology and Hydrology, Monks Wood)

  • William E. Kunin

    (University of Leeds)

Abstract

Interpretation of global biodiversity change is hampered by a lack of information on the historical status of most species in most parts of the world1,2,3,4,5. Here we show that declines and increases can be deduced from current species distributions alone, using spatial patterns of occupancy combined with distribution size. Declining species show sparse, fragmented distributions for their distribution size, reflecting the extinction process; expanding species show denser, more aggregated distributions, reflecting colonization. Past distribution size changes for British butterflies were deduced successfully from current distributions, and former distributions had some power to predict future change. What is more, the relationship between distribution pattern and change in British butterflies independently predicted distribution change for butterfly species in Flanders, Belgium, and distribution change in British rare plant species is similarly related to spatial distribution pattern. This link between current distribution patterns and processes of distribution change could be used to assess relative levels of threat facing different species, even for regions and taxa lacking detailed historical and ecological information.

Suggested Citation

  • Robert J. Wilson & Chris D. Thomas & Richard Fox & David B. Roy & William E. Kunin, 2004. "Spatial patterns in species distributions reveal biodiversity change," Nature, Nature, vol. 432(7015), pages 393-396, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:nat:nature:v:432:y:2004:i:7015:d:10.1038_nature03031
    DOI: 10.1038/nature03031
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.nature.com/articles/nature03031
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1038/nature03031?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Louis Iverson & Anantha Prasad & Stephen Matthews, 2008. "Modeling potential climate change impacts on the trees of the northeastern United States," Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, Springer, vol. 13(5), pages 487-516, June.
    2. Emilie Reuchlin-Hugenholtz & Nancy L Shackell & Jeffrey A Hutchings, 2015. "The Potential for Spatial Distribution Indices to Signal Thresholds in Marine Fish Biomass," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(3), pages 1-22, March.
    3. Erhan Mutlu & Ilaria de Meo & Claudia Miglietta & Mehmet Cengiz Deval, 2023. "Ecological Indicative Stressors of Native vs. Non-Native Fish in an Ultra-Oligotrophic Region of the Mediterranean Sea," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-28, February.
    4. Nwaichi, E. O. & Colin, S. E., 2017. "Sequestration of PAHs in a Phytoremediation Using Indian Mustard and Bambara Plants," Journal of Biotechnology Research, Academic Research Publishing Group, vol. 3(5), pages 31-41, 05-2017.
    5. Hui, Cang, 2011. "Forecasting population trend from the scaling pattern of occupancy," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 222(3), pages 442-446.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nat:nature:v:432:y:2004:i:7015:d:10.1038_nature03031. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.nature.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.