IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/nat/nature/v430y2004i6999d10.1038_nature02769.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Social parasitism by male-producing reproductive workers in a eusocial insect

Author

Listed:
  • Carlos Lopez-Vaamonde

    (Zoological Society of London)

  • J. Will Koning

    (Zoological Society of London)

  • Ruth M. Brown

    (Zoological Society of London)

  • William C. Jordan

    (Zoological Society of London)

  • Andrew F. G. Bourke

    (Zoological Society of London)

Abstract

The evolution of extreme cooperation, as found in eusocial insects (those with a worker caste), is potentially undermined by selfish reproduction among group members1,2,3. In some eusocial Hymenoptera (ants, bees and wasps), workers can produce male offspring from unfertilized eggs4. Kin selection theory predicts levels of worker reproduction as a function of the relatedness structure of the workers' natal colony and the colony-level costs of worker reproduction5,6. However, the theory has been only partially successful in explaining levels of worker reproduction7,8,9. Here we show that workers of a eusocial bumble bee (Bombus terrestris) enter unrelated, conspecific colonies in which they then produce adult male offspring, and that such socially parasitic workers reproduce earlier and are significantly more reproductive and aggressive than resident workers that reproduce within their own colonies. Explaining levels of worker reproduction, and hence the potential of worker selfishness to undermine the evolution of cooperation, will therefore require more than simply a consideration of the kin-selected interests of resident workers. It will also require knowledge of the full set of reproductive options available to workers, including intraspecific social parasitism.

Suggested Citation

  • Carlos Lopez-Vaamonde & J. Will Koning & Ruth M. Brown & William C. Jordan & Andrew F. G. Bourke, 2004. "Social parasitism by male-producing reproductive workers in a eusocial insect," Nature, Nature, vol. 430(6999), pages 557-560, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:nat:nature:v:430:y:2004:i:6999:d:10.1038_nature02769
    DOI: 10.1038/nature02769
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.nature.com/articles/nature02769
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1038/nature02769?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. William J Sutherland & David Goulson & Simon G Potts & Lynn V Dicks, 2011. "Quantifying the Impact and Relevance of Scientific Research," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 6(11), pages 1-10, November.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nat:nature:v:430:y:2004:i:6999:d:10.1038_nature02769. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.nature.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.